- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 14:47:19 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-webapps@w3.org
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Namespace names are things I copy from templates and never type from memory. Exactly, which means namespaces aren't memorable. The only reason to give up memorability is if you require the name to be both collision-free and context-free (see Zooko's Triangle). Both of those are nice (as they always are), but they're not really required for a workable namespace. Giving up memorability for no real benefit is a loss all around. In the specific case of intents, the same applies. We don't need them to be securely collision-free (collisions are slightly annoying for the user, but should be fairly rare in practice, and can be resolved by the user without a lot of trouble). They should be context-free, as they apply across the whole web. And they should be memorable, because authors have to type these and they get non-memorable things wrong. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 23 September 2011 21:48:06 UTC