- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:27:40 +0200
- To: ifette@google.com
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>, James Hawkins <jhawkins@google.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote: > While issuing a ton of patent exclusions for something like this would be rather poor, I would frankly rather have that then a spec that doesn't get any attention from a party that's clearly relevant only to have patents come up /after/ the spec is published and implemented. Agreed, but for that we need to go through rechartering this group to include the new deliverable (i.e., to give everyone a fair chance to say if they are willing to give up their IPR around this). I think your concerns are fair.
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2011 17:28:11 UTC