- From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:43:38 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
On 9/13/2011 11:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:32:03 +0200, Arthur Barstow > <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: >> On September 13, the Web Events WG published a LCWD of the Touch >> Events version 1 spec: >> Individual WG members are encouraged to provide individual feedback >> directly to the Web Events WG. If you have comments, please send them >> to the following list by October 11: >> >> public-webevents@w3.org@w3.org >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/ >> >> If anyone in WebApps wants to propose an official WG response, please >> do so ASAP, in reply to this email so the WebApps WG can discuss it. > > Given our work on the DOM I think we should oppose any new > XXXEvent.initXXXEvent() methods. > > Introducing a new Document interface rather than using partial > interface Document also seems bad. > > (I submitted both comments (and some others) as personal comments > already.) As I understand it, Touch Events v. 1 is only attempting to codify what's already been introduced by WebKit, namely, by Apple, and followed-up by others. That's in contrast to the parallel development of v. 2, which does try take on new items. -Charles
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 19:44:18 UTC