W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: RfC: LCWD of Touch Events version 1; deadline October 11

From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:43:38 -0700
Message-ID: <4E6FB26A.5030506@jumis.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
On 9/13/2011 11:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:32:03 +0200, Arthur Barstow 
> <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
>> On September 13, the Web Events WG published a LCWD of the Touch 
>> Events version 1 spec:
>> Individual WG members are encouraged to provide individual feedback 
>> directly to the Web Events WG. If you have comments, please send them 
>> to the following list by October 11:
>>     public-webevents@w3.org@w3.org
>>     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/
>> If anyone in WebApps wants to propose an official WG response, please 
>> do so ASAP, in reply to this email so the WebApps WG can discuss it.
> Given our work on the DOM I think we should oppose any new 
> XXXEvent.initXXXEvent() methods.
> Introducing a new Document interface rather than using partial 
> interface Document also seems bad.
> (I submitted both comments (and some others) as personal comments 
> already.)

As I understand it, Touch Events v. 1 is only attempting to codify 
what's already been introduced by WebKit,
namely, by Apple, and followed-up by others. That's in contrast to the 
parallel development of v. 2, which does
try take on new items.

Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 19:44:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:23 UTC