Re: Component Model Update

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>wrote:

> One thing missing is some kind of declarative way to define
> shadow trees, similar to XBL1's <content>.
>
> I think this omission is a big plus. XBL1 <content> is mysterious.  If a
dev tool wants to add support for building Components from declarative
markup, awesome. But the bizarre combo of xml, .css, and .js in XBL one is
poorly supported by tooling and thus is just a mess. Create a great JS
solution then let tools build on that.

jjb