[Bug 9738] Improve IDL documentation


Eliot Graff <eliotgra@microsoft.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Eliot Graff <eliotgra@microsoft.com> 2011-08-19 23:51:32 UTC ---
I believe that I finally have all of these covered. There are a few places in
which phrases are used rather than complete sentences, but they are on purpose
and appropriate, such as "The cursor's required direction" for the direction
parameter of IDBIndex.openCursor(). Other than those, I believe the spec is,
editorially speaking, in very good shape. the element order through the WebIDL
is consistent, and the sentences describing "on getting" are clear and in a
consistent style.

I am therefore going to resolve this bug as fixed.

Thanks so very much,


Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Friday, 19 August 2011 23:51:39 UTC