- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:34:47 +1200
- To: Paddy Byers <paddy.byers@gmail.com>
- CC: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>, Bryan Sullivan <blsaws@gmail.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps@w3.org, public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On 13/08/11 10:49 AM, Paddy Byers wrote: > WAC does refer to interfaces defined in one module from another module; > however, we have not been using scoped names for these references - we > use the unqualified interface name. More or less every WAC module does this. If WAC is already considering these names globally, and incorrectly referring to them without using scoped names, then it seems like they are not actually using the functionality that modules affords them.
Received on Saturday, 13 August 2011 00:35:30 UTC