- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:46:28 +0200
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: ext Paddy Byers <paddy.byers@gmail.com>, public-webapps@w3.org, public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi Paddy, > > If modules are removed from the Web IDL spec, what running code e.g. > browsers, web/widget runtimes, IDEs, test cases, etc. will no longer comply > with the spec (looking for real breakages here)? I don't think any runtimes would break... probably just this would need some changes: http://widl.webvm.net/ (though it is unlikely that the widl processor conforms to whatever the latest draft of WebIDL is) > If WAC needs that type of functionality, could they define their own IDL > extension? That would probably be fine. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Friday, 12 August 2011 12:47:17 UTC