- From: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 16:26:28 +0000
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Microsoft supports this CfC. On Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:13 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > The pre-LC comment period for Progress Events resulted in no comments > [1]. As such, Anne proposes a new LC be published and this is a CfC to > do so: > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/progress/ > > This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's > decision to request advancement" for this LCWD. > > Note the Process Document states the following regarding the > significance/meaning of a LCWD: > > [[ > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call > > Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that: > > * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant > technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document) > in the Working Draft; > > * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant > dependencies with other groups; > > * other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these > dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement > is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the > technical report to later maturity levels. > ]] > > Positive response to this CfC is preferred and encouraged and silence > will be assumed to mean agreement with the proposal. The deadline for > comments is August 2. Please send all comments to: > > public-webapps@w3.org > > Assuming there is consensus to publish this LCWD, the tentative plan is > to publish the LC on August 4 with a 3-week LC comment period (ending > August 25). > > -Art Barstow > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/1249.html
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 16:27:09 UTC