Re: UAs shipping unprefixed websocket API implementations?

On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 15:48:53 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <> wrote:
> indicates that the Chrome dev channel now has an unprefixed  
> implementation of the WebSocket API, as far as I can tell.  Also as far  
> as I can tell, the API is not really stabilized yet (e.g. there's the  
> big open question about whether the compression stuff is required or  
> forbidden).

That was resolved.

> Am I missing something?  Should UAs actually be shipping unprefixed  
> websockets at this point?

As long as they keep updating to match the specification it should not be  
a huge problem. Note that Chrome was already shipping an unprefixed API to  
date, just with an older version of the protocol.

Anne van Kesteren

Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 13:55:52 UTC