Re: [websockets] Making optional extensions mandatory in the API (was RE: Getting WebSockets API to Last Call)

On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:31:28 -0700, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)  
<ifette@google.com> wrote:
> I agree we shouldn't require deflate-stream it in the API. I don't agree  
> the API should specify an exact set of extensions, as that would prevent  
> any
> future versions/developments. A minimum baseline would be reasonable  
> though, once we have that minimum baseline in place (e.g. a stable set  
> of extensions that are well tested, such as compression and  
> multiplexing). I don't think we should put the cart before the horse.

The API specification is not frozen. Case in point: http://html5.org/r/6330


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 22:35:33 UTC