- From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:27:04 -0400
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > I would suggest not using the word "theft", even if placed in quotes. Call > it bandwidth "leeching" or something like that. It certainly is by no means > "theft" by any reasonable definition. "Theft" is a broad term that can informally encompass pretty much any activity that one person does to gain something at the expense of others. Like many words with strong connotations, it's very commonly used when the speaker wishes to apply the word's connotations to other things that they think are conceptually related to the point of deserving those connotations. Supposing that "theft" has the same meaning as "stealing", which is what your dictionary definition says, it's entirely unremarkable to speak of stealing ideas, stealing a kiss, stealing the show, stealing a base, and so on. The intent is to emphasize the act's injustice, sneakiness, or unexpectedness. However, I agree that there's no need to use loaded language here, even in quotation marks. "Bandwidth leeching" is probably neutral enough. If not, we could go with something even more neutral, like "using others' bandwidth".
Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 20:28:01 UTC