- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 21:14:47 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- cc: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, "webreq@w3.org" <webreq@w3.org>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 21:52:22 +0200, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > > If we really want to rescind a Recommendation, we should do that > > through the process defined for that. If we want to update people on > > where to find more recent information (but still the current > > specification is still valid for some cases) then we can probably add > > a status update. > > Was this in response to the note for DOM Level 2 Views, in response to > the request for doing something equivalent for DOM Level 3 Core, or > both? I think they should probably be rescinded as they are not to be > implemented (or not fully and in conflicting ways in case of DOM Level 3 > Core), but that is not really something I am interested in driving. Too > much process for very little benefit. FWIW, if we're adding notes, it'd also be good to add a note to the DOM2 HTML, HTML4.x and XHTML1.x specs saying that they've all been merged into the contemporary HTML spec. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 22 July 2011 21:15:12 UTC