- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:33:12 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
- cc: "Web Applications Working Group WG (public-webapps@w3.org)" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Adrian Bateman wrote: > > For platform features that directly affect web developers' pages that > might sometimes be true. However, compression is also optional in HTTP > and it doesn't appear to have caused problems or made some sites work > and others not based on some dominant implementation. Optional features in HTTP have caused no end of trouble and are amongst the many reasons I avoid optional features so much. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2011 19:33:47 UTC