Although there are ongoing discussions regarding exceptions, there were no objections to this CfC. As such, I will request publication of a LC specification to encourage broader review and comments. -AB On 6/30/11 6:46 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: > As Cameron indicated in [1], all non-enhancements bugs for Web IDL are > now resolved and as such, this is a Call for Consensus to publish a > Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL: > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/ > > This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's > decision to request advancement" for this LCWD. > > Note the Process Document states the following regarding the > significance/meaning of a LCWD: > > [[ > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call > > Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that: > > * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant > technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document) > in the Working Draft; > > * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant > dependencies with other groups; > > * other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these > dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement > is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the > technical report to later maturity levels. > ]] > > Positive response to this CfC is preferred and encouraged and silence > will be considered as agreement with the proposal. The deadline for > comments is July 7. Please send all comments to: > > public-script-coord@w3.org > > -Art Barstow > > >Received on Saturday, 9 July 2011 11:24:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:22 UTC