- From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 17:09:36 -0400
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > If the proposal is to make all exceptions have a "name" property (or > whatever we call it) whether in ES, in DOM, or anywhere else, and to have > everyone pick consistent exception names, then I'm fine with that. If we > do do that then I'd still say we should just have one exception interface > object, or at least no more objects than we have today, purely because > there would be no advantage to having more in such a situation. I think this is the proposal as it stands, yes. I don't *think* anyone participating in this discussion supports adding new interfaces for every exception type at this point. > Exactly. This is the kind of problem that occurs if we can avoid > coordination. We shouldn't avoid coordination. > > Authors don't care that there's six working groups or twelve. They just > have one platform they're authoring to. We need to act like one. Agreed.
Received on Friday, 8 July 2011 21:10:26 UTC