- From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 17:49:14 +0000
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
- CC: ben turner <bent.mozilla@gmail.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
done > -----Original Message----- > From: public-webapps-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonas Sicking > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 6:13 PM > To: Israel Hilerio > Cc: ben turner; public-webapps@w3.org > Subject: Re: [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals > commit > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com> > wrote: > >>On Thursday, June 23, 2011 1:52 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote: > >>> > >>>We noticed that section "4.3 Steps for committing a transaction" talks > about setting the event type for the IDBTransction.oncomplete event handler > to "commit". > >>>Did we intend for the handler to be named "oncommit" or should the > event type be "complete". > >>>The current wording implies that the reason the transaction completed > was because it was committed. > >>>The different terms made the section a little inconsistent. > >>>Do we want to change any names or keep it as is? > >>> > >>>Israel > > > > On Thursday, June 23, 2011 2:04 PM, Ben Turner wrote: > >>I think "complete" should be the correct type string. > >> > >> -Ben Turner > >> > > > > If everyone else agrees with Ben and me, I can work with Eliot to make the > change to the spec. > > Sounds great. > > / Jonas >
Received on Friday, 8 July 2011 17:49:42 UTC