Re: Mutation events replacement

On 7/5/11 5:21 PM, Rafael Weinstein wrote:
> For ChildlistChanged, the potential data to be included:
> -Target node*
> -Removed nodes*
> -Added nodes
> -one of nextSibling or previousSibling*
> My belief is that including the starred (*) data above would be
> sufficient to meet David's test of mirroring a tree *without* a ton of
> processing or O(N) memory.

How is that not O(N) memory?


Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 21:28:12 UTC