- From: John J. Barton <johnjbarton@johnjbarton.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 20:40:20 -0700
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
On 7/4/2011 6:39 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 7/4/11 12:23 PM, John J. Barton wrote: > >> By restricting mutation listeners to explicitly avoid DOM mutation, the >> most sophisticated case is no different than the simple case. Then all >> three can be accommodated. > > If such a restriction were feasible, it might be worth looking into. > It would involve not passing any DOM nodes to the mutation listener, I > suspect. All I am asking is a few minutes of reasonable consideration for alternatives before many thousands of person hours become invested in the proposed mutation events replacement. jjb
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 03:40:48 UTC