- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:19:05 -0700
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
On Sep 27, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Robin Berjon wrote: > On Sep 27, 2009, at 00:36 , Cameron McCormack wrote: >> Indeed, much of the custom [[Get]] etc. functionality can be turned >> into >> ES5 meta-object stuff. A pertinent question is then: should we >> change >> Web IDL to specify an ES5 binding (and not ES3) at this point, given >> that specs depending on it want to advance along the Rec track? > > I would tend to be rather in disfavour of anything that might cause > WebIDL to be delayed in any way. I also think that keeping the ES3 > binding is useful (in the short term at least) if only because it is > familiar, which might point to building the ES5 one separately. > > If at all possible I'd rather it went to LC ASAP, and if needed that > new stuff be done in a branched document. Based on the conversation so far, I expect Web IDL in roughly its current state would not survive Last Call. - Maciej
Received on Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:19:47 UTC