Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Cameron McCormack <> wrote:
> Indeed, much of the custom [[Get]] etc. functionality can be turned into
> ES5 meta-object stuff.  A pertinent question is then: should we change
> Web IDL to specify an ES5 binding (and not ES3) at this point, given
> that specs depending on it want to advance along the Rec track?

Since ES5 will be officially done well ahead of HTML5, I don't see why
not. But I do not know what your "Rec track" constraints imply.


Received on Saturday, 26 September 2009 22:44:11 UTC