- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:19:28 -0400
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
The draft minutes from the September 24 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/09/24-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 1 October 2009 (the next Widgets voice conference); otherwise these minutes will be considered Approved. -Regards, Art Barstow [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - Widgets Voice Conf 24 Sep 2009 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2009JulSep/1199.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2009/09/24-wam-irc Attendees Present Arve, Jere, AndyB, Frederick, Art, Steven, Benoit Regrets Josh, Marcin, Marcos, Robin Chair Art Scribe Art Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Review and tweak agenda 2. [6]Announcements 3. [7]News/summary from the Widget Testing event 4. [8]widget Interface spec: 5. [9]WARP spec: proposal by Dom to change uri attribute to "urlpattern"; 6. [10]URI Scheme spec: status 7. [11]VM Media Features spec: proposal to publish FPWD 8. [12]AOB * [13]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ <scribe> ScribeNick: ArtB <scribe> Scribe: Art Date: 24 September 2009 Review and tweak agenda AB: draft agenda was posted on Sep 23 ( [14]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/11 99.html ). During the widget Interface topic we will record the recent exchanges between Marcos and Marcin as well as the origin thread from Scott Wilson as a way of capturing ongoing discussions but we won't deep dive on them given Marcos will not be here today. [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2009JulSep/1199.html Arve: since Marcin and Marcos aren't here, we should probably drop the VM-I spec today AB: agree ... so given all of the Regrets, we will have a short call today Announcements AB: any short annoucements? [ None ] News/summary from the Widget Testing event AB: a widget testing event was held Sep 21-23 ( [15]http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/TestWorkshop2009 ). Does anyone have a summary or news they can share? ... since none of the event's participants are here today, we'll skip this [15] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/TestWorkshop2009 widget Interface spec: AB: Marcin and Marcos continue to discuss this thread ( [16]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/12 17.html ). ... Marcin and Marcos continue to discuss this thread ( [17]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/12 08.html ). ... the last email in this thread is from Scott ( [18]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/12 20.html ). One question here is "origin of a widget" versus "instance of widget". ... given Marcos isn't here today, we will drop this now but please continue to discuss this on public-webapps [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2009JulSep/1217.html [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2009JulSep/1208.html [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2009JulSep/1220.html WARP spec: proposal by Dom to change uri attribute to "urlpattern"; AB: Dom proposed ( [19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/12 02.html ) the <access> element's uri attribute be changed to "urlpattern" citing some related work done by the POWDER WG. Any comments? [19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2009JulSep/1202.html Arve: I'm unsure ... technically, he's probably right ... I agree it describes a URL pattern ... but I am skeptical to this change AB: given Marcin isn't here today, we will drop this now but please reply to this proposal on public-webapps JK: Dom had another suggestion and that was just "pattern" ... I prefer pattern to urlpattern Arve: let's take this to the mail list ... I need to do some investigation as I can't reach the POWDER document right now URI Scheme spec: status AB: without Robin here today, we'll skip this for today VM Media Features spec: proposal to publish FPWD AB: last week we agreed that today we consider if the VM-MF spec was ready for FPWD ( [20]http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vm/vm-mediafeature.src.html ). Marcin responded earlier today ( [21]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/12 52.html ) that he votes for FPWD. ... since then, Robin submitted some comment ( [22]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/12 54.html ). Robin, are any of these mandatory before FPWD publication? ... I think we need to defer the question is this doc ready for FPWD ... any comments or concerns about that? [20] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vm/vm- mediafeature.src.html [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2009JulSep/1252.html [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2009JulSep/1254.html Arve: I don't think we should go to FPWD until we have a chance to hear from others AB: anything else on this topic for today? AOB AB: any other topics for today? [ None ] AB: next meeting is October 1 ... meeting adjourned Summary of Action Items [End of minutes]
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:20:27 UTC