Re: more flexible ABNF for STS?

This sounds like a good idea.  One thing we can do to reduce the
complexity is to have different grammars for server conformance and
for user agent conformance.  Essentially, servers would be required to
conform to the current grammar, but UAs would be required to conform
to the more tolerant grammar.

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:27 PM, =JeffH <> wrote:
> invalid-STSDirective    = <name> | <name> ":" | <name> ":" <value>
> <name>                  = anything but ":" or ";"
> <value>                 = anything but ";"

I'm not sure what role ":" is playing here.  It might be easier to
just omit it from the grammar.


Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2009 22:36:20 UTC