- From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:55:27 +0300
- To: Jere.Kapyaho@nokia.com
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org, robin@berjon.com
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:49 PM, <Jere.Kapyaho@nokia.com> wrote: > /4/ Finally, the IRI vs URI naming debate applies as ever. I agree it's > messy in that we are so accustomed to URIs, but really should be using IRIs, > and that not everyone is conditioned to mentally replace URI with IRI every > time. Maybe changing the document name to "Widgets 1.0: Widget Resource > Identifiers" would sidestep some of the problem. :-) So we can have URNs, URLs, URIs, IRIs, and WRIs? i'm not sure that's an improvement :)
Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2009 10:56:11 UTC