- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 23:34:06 +0200
- To: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
- Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi Marcin, On Jul 26, 2009, at 20:51 , Marcin Hanclik wrote: > 1. renaming the Widgets 1.0: URI Scheme specification to Widgets > 1.0: URI (or Widgets 1.0: Widget URI or so) I've changed it to "Widgets 1.0: Widget URIs". Not the most elegant title to grace the delicate shores of TR but we've seen worse. > 2. adding > widget-scheme = "widget" > rule > 3. modifying the existing rule > widget-URI = "widget:" "//" [ authority ] "/" zip-rel-path [ "?" > query ] [ "#" fragment ] > to > widget-URI = widget-scheme "://" [ authority ] "/" zip-rel-path > [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ] Done (except that it's different from the above because it references the i-variants). > 4. updating the related sections, e.g. adding section on scheme > registration (some other document?), splitting text for widget-URI > and widget-scheme, since these are different things etc. I've clarified this, and split the text into sub-sections. Indeed the scheme becomes almost a side-note. Thanks! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 21:34:49 UTC