Re: [widget] relax NG schema

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Robin Berjon<> wrote:
> On Sep 1, 2009, at 13:44 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>>> It would be straightforward to have a P+C module with a group for the
>>> choice of its children, and then for instance WARP could just add
>>> <access> to that content.
>> Nah. I don't like it! Not only does it require a rocket-science degree,
>> but it's still means that you need to look in X-number of places to collate
>> all the bits of the schema. Like the Internets, this should all be
>> centralized ;)
> Don't worry, I'll have your cake and eat it too.
>>> Furthermore, since the schema isn't normative anyway, I think it could
>>> just sit in CVS like a software project and be pointed to by the specs.
>>> No need to include it in the spec's body.
>> Yes. This I like. Simple and centralized:
> Good. Cool. So I've made a few changes:
>  - renamed it to .rnc since it's in RNC and not RNG
>  - modularised it as explained earlier — so you can be happy because it's
> centralised to a single directory, but it's not a centralised file
>  - removed the built-in extensibility and used NVDL instead, which is more
> appropriate and maintainable
>  - added support for WARP
>  - removed a bunch of bugs
>  - added a bunch of tests (examples from the spec) to make sure it's okay

Awesome! Thanks Robin!

Marcos Caceres

Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 17:21:02 UTC