- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:04:02 +0200
- To: Laxmi Narsimha Rao Oruganti <Laxmi.Oruganti@microsoft.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Pablo Castro <Pablo.Castro@microsoft.com>
Hi Laxmi, just to make sure that we are clear on what you are objecting to: the CfC is for a Working Draft (what's more, the first) to be published. This by no means entails ratification by W3C, it simply reflects where the group is on that topic. This is not to say that you shouldn't object, I am just indicating that you can dislike this specification and still agree that it can be published because it'll grant it wider review than what it has today (and perhaps spur someone into proposing something better before this ships). I personally agree with your objections, but I'm okay with this draft being published because I'd really like browsers to have an advanced form of storage, and since I think SQL is the wrong option for this I'm hoping it'll scare someone into offering a better alternative. I am curious: given that you care about the right option being selected here, have you considered proposing LINQ as an option for the WG to work on (or a subset thereof)? Having a positive proposal can go a long way in terms of shaping a specification. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 13:04:54 UTC