RE: [ViewModes] Proposal: split the specification, add new events

Hi Robin,

Good point!

In the email and attachment starting this thread I included the comment that AspectRatioChangeEvent could be realized with ResolutionChangeEvent. With your comment the question is whether we need ResolutionChangeEvent if we already have onresize.
We have change from pull model (onresize is invoked, but the resolution has to be fetched separately) to push model (new dimensions are in the event). Do we need ResolutionChangeEvent then?
Any opinion?

Thanks,
Marcin

Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452  |  Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanclik@access-company.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin@berjon.com]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 12:40 PM
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: [ViewModes] Proposal: split the specification, add new events

Hi,

On Aug 20, 2009, at 13:55 , Marcin Hanclik wrote:
> My proposal is:
>
> 1. Let [2] specify only "view-mode" media feature.

I think that's a good idea.

> Ad b)
>
> As listed in the attached document the orientation and aspect-ratio
> media features do not depend on the device and may change
> dynamically. So I would like to propose the following:
>
> 1. Add OrientationChangeEvent
> 2. Add AspectRatioChangeEvent

I think that these are useful events, but I'd like to make sure we're
not duplicating existing stuff. Notably, how is AspectRatioChangeEvent
different from onresize?

--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/




________________________________________

Access Systems Germany GmbH
Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda

www.access-company.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.

Received on Monday, 24 August 2009 10:47:43 UTC