- From: Arve Bersvendsen <arveb@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:31:52 +0200
- To: "Simon Harper" <simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk>, marcosc@opera.com
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:45:14 +0200, Simon Harper <simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > As far as I can see, the browser is the (JavaScript+HTML) interpreter, > therefore a richer accessibility bridge is required, which will not be > addressed by ARIA alone. Just to clarify something here: The Widgets P&C specification is agnostic with regards to the underlying technology platform, and does not actually require the content contained within the widget to be web content/applications. If you want to use "Widgets" as a container/packaging format for, say, Windows or Linux applications, you are most certainly free to do so (not that I would recommend it, though). As such, I believe the widget space is the wrong arena to discuss accessibility issues, unless some part of the widget family of specifications directly prohibit accessible applications. -- Arve Bersvendsen Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com/
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 09:32:34 UTC