- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:17:41 +0200
- To: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
- CC: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "connolly@w3.org" <connolly@w3.org>, "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>
Marcin Hanclik wrote: > Hi Marcos, > > Thanks for your comments. > >>> I think we should ask i18n for guidance. > Let's ask them. > >>> To Step 7, I've added "If doc is encoded in a format that is >>> unsupported by the user agent, then the user agent must terminate this >>> algorithm and treat this widget package as an invalid Zip archive. " > I am not sure whether this solves the real issue. > Let's take the case I mentioned initially in this thread. > The doc is encoded in us-ascii, so utf-8-capable WUA shall understand it. > The problem is with the encoding of the IRI. > Here, I assume, some statements about the normalization could help. > > So, I think, we could take this use case to i18n and let them guide us. > I'm obviously not getting the problem, so I'll let you take charge on this.
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 12:18:26 UTC