- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:21:01 +1000
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Ian Hickson: > I updated HTML5 to use the new Web IDL stuff. Great! I notice you haven’t used nullable types for any of the DOMString arguments, attributes or return types. Was that a conscious choice? http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#idl-nullable-type Bare DOMStrings now mean a type that doesn’t include the null value. > Here's what's missing, and how I've used it: > > * Some interfaces need multipler "caller"s. I've assumed that I can > specify "caller" on multiple operations and have the overloading behaviour > handle it automatically. Done: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#call > * Some interfaces need the "caller" and the "getter" to be the same > operation. I've assumed that one can specify both on the same operation. Done: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#prod-Operation > * [Supplemental]: For specification process reasons, some interface > definitions don't get organised the same way as we want from > implementations. I've assumed that [Supplemental] will exist, and used it > as follows: Work on [Supplemental] forthcoming. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 06:21:42 UTC