- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:26:15 +0200
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On further consideration, Opera has decided this is not a bug. We would like to leave the behavior as is in the spec. What do others think? On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Marcos Caceres<marcosc@opera.com> wrote: > Opera QA has found the following bug in the Widgets 1.0: Packaging and > Configuration W3C Candidate Recommendation 23 July 2009 [1]. > > Description of bug: > In Step 7, when a content element's src attribute's values is not a > valid path, the UA treats the widget as an invalid widget. It should, > instead, skip the offending content element and try to recover by > using a default start file. > > Proposed solution: > In Step 7, when a content element's src attribute's values is not a > valid path, the UA should try to fallback to default start files. This > would be achieved by changing the following text from: > > [[ > If path is a valid path, let file be the result of applying the rule > for finding a file within a widget package to path. If path is not a > valid path, then a user agent must treat the widget package as an > invalid Zip archive. > ]] > > To: > [[ > If path is not a valid path, then the user agent must skip this element. > If path is a valid path, let file be the result of applying the rule > for finding a file within a widget package to path. If file is null or > in error, then the user agent must skip this element. > ]] > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-widgets-20090723/ > -- > Marcos Caceres > http://datadriven.com.au > -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Friday, 7 August 2009 13:27:23 UTC