- From: Nikunj R. Mehta <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:25:34 -0700
- To: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
- Cc: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:15 PM, Adrian Bateman wrote: >>> While it might not be the perfect solution (we know the web far from >>> ideal and is a lot of compromise), this type of proposal would be a >>> lot more compelling to me if I could say "This is what we have to >>> add, this is how, and here are the use cases that make it valuable" >>> with a roadmap for extending what people are already building >>> instead of something brand new. >> >> Would you mind explaining the last point "with a roadmap for >> extending >> what people are already building instead of something brand new." for >> me? I would definitely strive to make the proposal more compelling. > > What I'm asking for is a more unified proposal that says "If you > have already implemented AppCache, here's what you add to make the > same cache provide the additional functionality needed to enable > these additional use cases." This will inevitably be a compromise > from what a pure implementation looks like (your current DataCache > spec, say) but lots of the web is necessarily a compromise because > it builds on prior art that might not have been ideal but has been > specified, built and deployed (and not always in that order). > > This would allow people to form a judgement about whether the > additional use cases are worth the additional effort instead of > whether the additional use cases are worth yet another cache. I > think the ship has already sailed on AppCache and we can't undo that > even if we wanted to and I don't think a competing solution is the > right approach. What kind of extensions/changes to AppCache would be acceptable at this point? In a previous exchange with Ian, he declined to consider DataCache like extensions to ApplicationCache for HTML5, which might be the reasonable thing to do. I can of course put together a proposal, but it would be good to know from browser vendors what their preferences are in this matter. I am open to the idea of incrementally evolving AppCache to be more supportive of DataCache requirements. Regards, Nikunj
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2009 06:28:02 UTC