Re: Modules for IDL fragments in W3C specifications (was: Re: An import statement for Web IDL)

Cameron McCormack:
> > With that in mind, here is a mostly concrete proposal:
> > 
> >   * All W3C specs will place interfaces and exceptions at the top level
> >     scope (i.e., not in a module).

Ian Hickson:
> Based on this, I haven't added the text you suggested earlier in the same 
> e-mail about the HTML5 spec being in an 'html' module.

That’s acceptable, assuming we can get agreement that the above proposal
is one that all specs will use.  Perhaps I should add it as a
non-normative section in Web IDL to help it get wider review when we go
to LC.

Cameron McCormack ≝

Received on Sunday, 19 July 2009 23:59:50 UTC