- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:43:13 -0700
- To: "Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>
- Cc: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Hi Nikunj, So one of the things I've never fully understood with your proposal is what usage patterns people are going to want to use this new API with. Is the idea that people that use XMLHttpRequest to load data from the server will in offline mode want to intercept those XHR requests and respond with data stored in for example localStorage or some other type of clientside storage? Without having to change the code that uses the XHR object? Or is the idea that for things like <img src=...> or <script src=...> people will in offline mode want to intercept these requests and serve replies based on data stored in localStorage/elsewhere? Or both? Or something else? / Jonas On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta<nikunj.mehta@oracle.com> wrote: > I have published the first draft of the DataCache API, which is based on > Oracle's BITSY proposal [1]. Here's a link to the draft: > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DataCache/ > This document defines APIs for dynamically and statically serving > off-line representations of HTTP resources. > > As the Chairs have concluded this to be within the scope of our current > charter, I would request feedback from you so we can incorporate it before > publication as a working draft. > > Nikunj > http://o-micron.blogspot.com > > [1] http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/feeds/spec/bitsy.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/0098.html > >
Received on Thursday, 16 July 2009 21:44:13 UTC