Re: Widgets PAG seeks feedback on Widget Updates spec

Dear Robin,

Thanks for your email.

Robin Berjon a écrit :
>> There would then be a good case for the WG to spend some time on 
>> devising a proper workaround.
>> Anyone sharing my opinion that the widget update feature will be 
>> consistenly implemented (even if optional) ?
> You seem to be mixing up Widget Updates and the update() method, is 
> that the case?
JCD: I understood the widget.update() method being discussed to be the 
scripted version of the Widget Updates mechanism.
Please tell me if I am wrong. The current draft seems to still say that.
And I am really not sure that a script-triggered version of the update 
mechanism can be discarded off-hand.
Best regards

PS: test sequences may be informative, but their content defines what is 
tested for normative behavior, so if a feature is tested in a sequence, 
it will appear normative to lawyers, even if the text of the spec says 

JC Dufourd
Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group
Traitement du Signal et Images/Signal and Image Processing
Télécom ParisTech, 46 rue Barrault, 75 013 Paris, France 

Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2009 15:57:18 UTC