- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:08:50 +0100
- To: public-Webapps@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-widgets-20090528/ Comment 2 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0907-widgets-pc/ Editorial/substantive: E Tracked by: AP Location in reviewed document: Section 8.3 [http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-widgets-20090528/#attribute-types] Comment: Section 8.3 (Attribute Types) contains a subsection called "URI Attribute" which is relevant to our comment above. It says: -- An attribute defined as containing a valid URI. A valid URI is one that matches the URI token of the [URI] specification or the IRI token of the [RFC3987] specification. The value of this kind of attribute is retrieved using the rule for getting a single attribute value. -- This is problematical, since all URIs are IRIs, but not the converse. We think this should favor IRI and note the relationship to URI.
Received on Thursday, 9 July 2009 19:09:04 UTC