Wednesday, 30 September 2009
- Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Selectors
- Re: Please don't call your API "simple"
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- [widgets] P&C: LC#3 and CR#2
- Re: [widgets] Conformance Checker assertions spec
- [WebIDL] Trying to understand IndexGetter/NameGetter
- Re: [widgets] Conformance Checker assertions spec
- Re: [widgets] Conformance Checker assertions spec
- Re: skipping and ignoring
- [widgets] Draft Agenda for 1 October 2009 Voice Conf
- Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (1)
- RE: [A&E] Last Call comments (1)
- Re: [widgets] Conformance Checker assertions spec
- Re: [widgets] Conformance Checker assertions spec
- Re: [widgets] Test suite questions
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Please don't call your API "simple"
- Re: Please don't call your API "simple"
- Please don't call your API "simple"
Tuesday, 29 September 2009
- RE: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File
- Re: RFC: WebApp Timing (Rnd 2)
- RE: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File
- Re: [widgets] Conformance Checker assertions spec
- Re: [widgets] Conformance Checker assertions spec
- Re: [widgets] Test suite questions
- [widgets] Test suite questions
- [widgets] Conformance Checker assertions spec
- [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File
- [eventsource] Last-Event-ID
- Re: [XHR2] Upload progress events and simple cross-origin requests
- Re: [widget-digsig] Test assertions
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose
- Re: WebIDL
- [widget-digsig] Test assertions
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: WebIDL: how to address the various audiences and constraints?
Monday, 28 September 2009
- New Scripting Coordination List Set Up
- RE: Web IDL Garden Hose
- Re: [XHR2] Upload progress events and simple cross-origin requests
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: [widgets] Closing widget Interface issues
- Re: RFC: WebApp Timing (Rnd 2)
- Re: WebIDL: how to address the various audiences and constraints?
- Re: WebIDL: how to address the various audiences and constraints?
- WebIDL: how to address the various audiences and constraints?
- Re: [XHR2] Upload progress events and simple cross-origin requests
- [widgets] Closing widget Interface issues
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: Let's set up a mailing list for coordination with ECMA and Web IDL discussion
- Re: Let's set up a mailing list for coordination with ECMA and Web IDL discussion
- Re: Let's set up a mailing list for coordination with ECMA and Web IDL discussion
- Re: Let's set up a mailing list for coordination with ECMA and Web IDL discussion
Sunday, 27 September 2009
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Let's set up a mailing list for coordination with ECMA and Web IDL discussion
- Re: Cross posting madness must stop.
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Cross posting madness must stop.
- Fwd: Cross posting madness must stop.
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose
- Re: Cross posting madness must stop.
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Fwd: Web IDL Garden Hose
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Cross posting madness must stop.
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose
- Re: Using progress events for other purposes
- New Progress editor's draft
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose
- Re: Using progress events for other purposes
- Re: Using progress events for other purposes
- ISSUE-105 (what is loading?): How should we count progress of things which are not measured in bytes? [Progress Events]
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- W3C process: was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Selectors
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- RE: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Selectors
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- RE: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
Saturday, 26 September 2009
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: WebIDL
- RE: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: WebIDL
- RFC: WebApp Timing (Rnd 2)
- Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Selectors
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- RE: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: WebIDL
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- WebIDL
- RE: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
Friday, 25 September 2009
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Selectors
- Re: [widgets] Widgets test creation event
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- RE: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ISSUE-104: supporting structured clones [XHR2]
- Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Selectors
- Re: ISSUE-104: supporting structured clones [XHR2]
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: CfC: to publish the FPWD of the Web Simple Database API spec; deadline 25 September
- Re: [widgets] Widgets test creation event
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Selectors
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- ISSUE-104: supporting structured clones [XHR2]
- ISSUE-103: accessing status/statusText/getResponseHeader()/getAllResponseHeaders() [XHR]
- [webdatabase] wording on "Parsing and processing SQL statements" section
- Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Selectors
- ISSUE-75 and ISSUE-91: closing
- ISSUE-77: loadend
- [widgets] Widgets test creation event
- Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Selectors
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: skipping and ignoring
- Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Selectors
- Re: CfC: to publish the FPWD of the Web Simple Database API spec; deadline 25 September
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: Progress Events - Credits Edits
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- Re: Progress Events - Credits Edits
- [selectors-api] Scoped Selectors
- [selectors-api] Matches Selector Interface
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
Thursday, 24 September 2009
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: CORS redirect behavior proposal
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [WARP] "uri" attribute is confusing
- Re: [widgets] Comments on API spec: Storage areas and Origin
- Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (1)
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- [Bug 7720] New: Redundant definition of openDatabase methods
- Re: CORS redirect behavior proposal
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: Multimodal Interaction WG questions for WebApps (especially WebAPI)
- Multimodal Interaction WG questions for WebApps (especially WebAPI)
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- Re: skipping and ignoring
- [widgets] Draft Minutes for 24 September 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Comments on View Modes Media Feature ED
- ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination
- RE: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 24 September 2009 Voice Conf
- Re: CORS redirect behavior proposal
- RE: [widgets] Comments for pre-FPWD of View Modes Media Feature spec
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: XHR request state vs provisional responses
- At Risk - 24 September 2009 Voice Conf
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: XHR request state vs provisional responses
- Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization
- Re: [progress events] editorial fixes and module
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- RE: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- RE: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 24 September 2009 Voice Conf
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- CfC: Event Namespaces Removed
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Queries
- Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Queries
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Queries
- Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Queries
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Queries
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
Wednesday, 23 September 2009
- Re: more flexible ABNF for STS?
- Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- [widgets] Comments for pre-FPWD of View Modes Media Feature spec
- Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (1)
- Re: FYI: W3C Workshop on Access Control Application Scenarios; Nov 17-18 in Luxembourg
- Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 24 September 2009 Voice Conf
- Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (1)
- Mail List Etiquette & How to Loose Your Privileges
- Re: [widgets] WURI Review pre-LC review
- Re: CORS redirect behavior proposal
- Re: FYI: W3C Workshop on Access Control Application Scenarios; Nov 17-18 in Luxembourg
- Re: Publishing XMLHttpRequest
- Re: skipping and ignoring
- Re: Progress Events - Credits Edits
- Re: XHR request state vs provisional responses
- Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization
- Re: [cors] Comments on 17 March 2009
- Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization
- RE: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 24 September 2009 Voice Conf
- Re: Progress Events - Credits Edits
- RE: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 24 September 2009 Voice Conf
- [WARP] "uri" attribute is confusing
- RE: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- Re: CORS redirect behavior proposal
- [widgets] Draft Agenda for 24 September 2009 Voice Conf
- [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2
- skipping and ignoring
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Section 5 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
Tuesday, 22 September 2009
Wednesday, 23 September 2009
- Re: File API to separate reading from files
- FYI: W3C Workshop on Access Control Application Scenarios; Nov 17-18 in Luxembourg
Tuesday, 22 September 2009
- Renaming WebSimpleDatabase to WebSimpleDB
- Re: [cors] Incorrect use cases
- Re: BarCamp on Accessible Media @ Stanford on November 1
- Re: [EventSource] feedback from implementors
- Re: [EventSource] feedback from implementors
- Focus and focus()/blur() [ISSUE-102]
- ISSUE-102 (focus and focus()): Behavior of focus events when interacting with focus()/blur() methods needs to be defined [DOM3 Events]
Monday, 21 September 2009
- more flexible ABNF for STS?
- Re: fyi: Strict Transport Security (STS) specification
- fyi: NoScript to impl Strict Transport Security (STS) spec
- Re: WebDatabase bug tracking
- Re: WebDatabase bug tracking
- Re: Resending Re: WebDatabase review: SQLResultSetRowList
- WebDatabase bug tracking
- Re: Resending Re: WebDatabase review: SQLResultSetRowList
- Re: Resending Re: WebDatabase review: SQLResultSetRowList
- Re: Resending Re: WebStorage and WebDatabase - creation and exceptions
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Section 5 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: Resending Re: WebDatabase review: SQLResultSetRowList
- Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization
- Re: [widgets] Editorial Comments on 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Section 5 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: Resending Re: WebDatabase review: SQLResultSetRowList
- Resending Re: WebDatabase review: SQLResultSetRowList
- Resending Re: WebStorage and WebDatabase - creation and exceptions
- Re: [EventSource] feedback from implementors
- Re: fyi: Strict Transport Security specification
- Re: [EventSource] feedback from implementors
- Re: fyi: Strict Transport Security specification
- Re: [EventSource] feedback from implementors
- Re: fyi: Strict Transport Security specification
Saturday, 19 September 2009
Friday, 18 September 2009
Saturday, 19 September 2009
- RE: fyi: Strict Transport Security specification
- Re: HTML extension for system idle detection.
- Re: [EventSource] feedback from implementors
Friday, 18 September 2009
Saturday, 19 September 2009
- Re: fyi: Strict Transport Security specification
- Re: Progress Events - Credits Edits
- Re: fyi: Strict Transport Security specification
- Re: Request for Reviewers: Section 7.4 of Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines; deadline Sep 24
- Re: fyi: Strict Transport Security specification
- Progress Events - Credits Edits
- Re: fyi: Strict Transport Security specification
- fyi: Strict Transport Security specification
Friday, 18 September 2009
- Re: Request to publish WebSimpleDatabase as FPWD
- Re: Seeking Agenda Topics for WebApps' API meeting November 2-3
- Re: Request to publish WebSimpleDatabase as FPWD
- CfC: to publish the FPWD of the Web Simple Database API spec; deadline 25 September
- Re: Request to publish WebSimpleDatabase as FPWD
- Re: HTML extension for system idle detection.
- Re: Request to publish WebSimpleDatabase as FPWD
- Re: Seeking Agenda Topics for WebApps' API meeting November 2-3
- Re: HTML extension for system idle detection.
- Re: HTML extension for system idle detection.
- Re: HTML extension for system idle detection.
Thursday, 17 September 2009
- Request to publish WebSimpleDatabase as FPWD
- Re: WebIDL roadmap?
- Re: HTML extension for system idle detection.
- Re: HTML extension for system idle detection.
- Re: HTML extension for system idle detection.
- Re: HTML extension for system idle detection.
- Seeking Agenda Topics for WebApps' API meeting November 2-3
- Re: HTML extension for system idle detection.
- Re: HTML extension for system idle detection.
- Re: Request for Reviewers: Section 7.4 of Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines; deadline Sep 24
- Request for Reviewers: Section 7.4 of Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines; deadline Sep 24
- Re: HTML extension for system idle detection.
- BarCamp on Accessible Media @ Stanford on November 1
- RE: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- [WARP] Last Call comments (3)
- RE: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- [WARP] Last Call comments (2)
- RE: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- Re: WARP: Example
- RE: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- Re: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- Re: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- Re: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- Re: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- [widgets] Draft Minutes from 17 September 2009 Voice Conf
- Re: [widgets] WURI Review pre-LC review
- Re: [widgets] WURI Review pre-LC review
- Re: [widget-uri] Widget URI ABNF definition comments
- RE: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 17 September 2009 voice conf
- Re: HTML extension for system idle detection.
- Re: WebIDL roadmap?
- FW: BONDI 1.01 Approved Release
- Re: HTML extension for system idle detection.
Wednesday, 16 September 2009
Thursday, 17 September 2009
Wednesday, 16 September 2009
- Re: WebIDL roadmap?
- Ericsson referred patents vs Web Sockets API and Server-Sent Events
- [widgets] [i18n+P&C] IRI/URI normalization
- Re: [widgets] Comments on API spec: Storage areas and Origin
- Re: [widgets] Comments on section 5.1 protected preferences
- Re: WebIDL roadmap?
- WebIDL roadmap?
- RE: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Re: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Re: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 17 September 2009 voice conf
- [widgets] Draft Agenda for 17 September 2009 voice conf
- RE: [widget-uri] Widget URI ABNF definition comments
- RE: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Re: [WebStorage] structured clones serialization
- Re: [WebStorage] structured clones serialization
- RE: [A&E] LC deadline: request to prolong LC period
- Re: [WebStorage] structured clones serialization
Tuesday, 15 September 2009
- Re: [A&E] LC deadline: request to prolong LC period
- [A&E] LC deadline: request to prolong LC period
- [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization
- [A&E] Last Call comments (1)
- RE: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- [widgets] Comments on 4-Aug-2009 LCWD of WARP spec
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Section 6 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: [widgets] Editorial Comments on 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: [widgets] Editorial Comments on 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Section 6 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Section 6 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- Re: [widget-uri] Widget URI ABNF definition comments
- Re: [widget-uri] Widget URI ABNF definition comments
- [widget-uri] Widget URI ABNF definition comments
Monday, 14 September 2009
- Re: RFC: WebApp timing
- Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send()
- Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send()
- [WebStorage] structured clones serialization
- Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send()
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Section 5 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Section 5 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: [widgets] Editorial Comments on 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: ISSUE: The application/widget media type has not yet been registered with IANA. This will happen when the specification reaches Candidate Recommendation status.
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Section 5 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: [widgets] Editorial Comments on 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
Friday, 11 September 2009
Monday, 14 September 2009
- Re: ISSUE: The application/widget media type has not yet been registered with IANA. This will happen when the specification reaches Candidate Recommendation status.
- ISSUE: The application/widget media type has not yet been registered with IANA. This will happen when the specification reaches Candidate Recommendation status.
Sunday, 13 September 2009
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Section 6 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- [widgets] Comments on section 5.1 protected preferences
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Section 5 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: [widgets] Editorial Comments on 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- [widgets] Reminder: Sept 20 is deadline for comments for LCWD of the WARP spec
Saturday, 12 September 2009
- Marked addEventListenerNS and removeEventListenerNS At Risk
- Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send()
- Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send()
- Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send()
Friday, 11 September 2009
- Re: [widgets] Editorial Comments on 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: [widgets] Editorial Comments on 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send()
- Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send()
- Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send()
Thursday, 10 September 2009
- [widgets] Comments on Section 6 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- [widgets] Draft Minutes for 10 September 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- Re: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Re: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Re: [widgets] Preference element is underspecified :(
- Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send()
- Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send()
- Re: [widgets] Preference element is underspecified :(
Wednesday, 9 September 2009
- [widgets] Comments on Section 5 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: [websockets] structured clones
- Re: [websockets] structured clones
- [widgets] Editorial Comments on 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec
- Re: Web IDL for our API spec.
- Re: [websockets] structured clones
- Re: [websockets] structured clones
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- [widgets] Preference element is underspecified :(
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- [websockets] structured clones
- WARP: Example
- [widgets] Draft Agenda for 10 September 2009 Voice Conf
- Re: [widgets] Seeking approval of P&C Test Suite templates and guide
- Re: [widgets] Seeking approval of P&C Test Suite templates and guide
Tuesday, 8 September 2009
- Re: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- [widgets] Reminder: Comments on LCWD of Widgets APIs and Events spec due 15 Sept 2009
- Re: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- RE: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- RE: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
Monday, 7 September 2009
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- Re: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Re: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- RE: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- Re: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Re: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
Saturday, 5 September 2009
Friday, 4 September 2009
Monday, 7 September 2009
- RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- RE: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?
Sunday, 6 September 2009
Saturday, 5 September 2009
- Re: [WebSimpleDatabase] New spec, editor's draft available
- Re: [WebSimpleDatabase] New spec, editor's draft available
Friday, 4 September 2009
- [WebSimpleDatabase] New spec, editor's draft available
- Re: CfC: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec; deadline 7 September
- [web databases] SQLStatementErrorCallback
- [widgets] Apache Social and Widgets Meetup at ApacheCon US, Nov 2009
- Re: [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: APIs and Events spec; deadline 15 Sept 2009
- Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?
- Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?
- Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- Re: [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- Re: [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: APIs and Events spec; deadline 15 Sept 2009
- [ViewModes] Specification split
- ISSUE-100 (Marcin Hanclik): Event's bubbling and cancelation [ViewModes]
- ISSUE-101 (Marcin Hanclik): Event's generation [ViewModes]
- Re: PFWG comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration Last Call (late, very late)
- Re: CfC: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec; deadline 7 September
- Re: CfC: to publish a new Working Draft of Web Storage spec; deadline 7 September
- Re: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Re: [web databases] changeVersion error reporting
- Re: [web databases] changeVersion error reporting
- [web databases] changeVersion error reporting
Thursday, 3 September 2009
- Re: DnD vs CnP (was Copy/Paste Events)
- RE: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec; deadline 7 September
- RE: to publish a new Working Draft of Web Storage spec; deadline 7 September
- Re: DnD vs CnP (was Copy/Paste Events)
- Re: [widgets] WURI Review pre-LC review
- [widgets] Draft Minutes for 3 September 2009 Voice Conference
- [webdatabase] Minor Clarification Needed in Processing Model
- Re: DnD vs CnP (was Copy/Paste Events)
- [widgets] WURI Review pre-LC review
- Re: (no subject)
- RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Re: [WebIDL] mixins and [[Prototype]]s (and <object>s)
- Re: [WebIDL] Feedback on the August 30 Editor's draft
Wednesday, 2 September 2009
- RE: [WebIDL] Feedback on the August 30 Editor's draft
- Re: [webdatabase] changeVersion should allow all callbacks to be optional
- Re: [webdatabase] changeVersion should allow all callbacks to be optional
- Re: [webdatabase] changeVersion should allow all callbacks to be optional
- Re: [WIDGET URI] i18n comment 1: URI Spec
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme -> URI [+ Scheme]
- Re: Request for Comments: FPWD of Widgets 1.0: URI Scheme spec
- Re: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Re: Request for Comments: FPWD of Widgets 1.0: URI Scheme spec
- Re: Last-call comment: Widgets 1.0: APIs and Events
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- Last-call comment: Widgets 1.0: APIs and Events
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
- Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack!
Monday, 31 August 2009
Wednesday, 2 September 2009
- Re: [WebIDL] Feedback on the August 30 Editor's draft
- Re: [Widget URI] Bugs (1)
- [widgets] Draft agenda for 3 September 2009 Voice Conf
- [web databases] about rowids
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- Re: CfC: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec; deadline 7 September
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- RE: to publish a new WD of the DOM3 Events spec; deadline Sep 4
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- Re: CfC: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec; deadline 7 September
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- RE: to publish a new WD of the DOM3 Events spec; deadline Sep 4
Tuesday, 1 September 2009
- Re: CfC: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec; deadline 7 September
- RE: CfC: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec; deadline 7 September
- RE: CfC: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec; deadline 7 September
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- Re: CfC: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec; deadline 7 September
- RE: CfC: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec; deadline 7 September
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- Re: CfC: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec; deadline 7 September
- Re: CfC: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec; deadline 7 September
- Re: CfC: to publish a new Working Draft of Web Storage spec; deadline 7 September
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- Re: File API to separate reading from files
- Re: File API to separate reading from files
- Re: [WebIDL] Feedback on the August 30 Editor's draft
- Re: [WebIDL] Feedback on the August 30 Editor's draft
- Re: [WebIDL] Feedback on the August 30 Editor's draft
- Re: CfC: to publish a new Working Draft of Web Storage spec; deadline 7 September
- RE: CfC: to publish a new WD of the DOM3 Events spec; deadline Sep 4
- [WebIDL] Feedback on the August 30 Editor's draft
- Re: File API to separate reading from files
- Re: File API to separate reading from files
- Re: File API to separate reading from files
- Re: File API to separate reading from files
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
Monday, 31 August 2009
- WebDatabase review: SQLResultSetRowList
- Re: DnD vs CnP (was Copy/Paste Events)
- Exceptions in WebDatabase
- Re: [webdatabase] Transaction Locks
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- WebDatabase open interface methods
- WebStorage and WebDatabase - creation and exceptions
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- CfC: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec; deadline 7 September
- CfC: to publish a new Working Draft of Web Storage spec; deadline 7 September
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- Re: [widget] relax NG schema
- [widget] relax NG schema
- Re: [WebDatabase] Ready for First Public WD?
- [WebDatabase] Ready for First Public WD?
- [webdatabase] Transaction Locks
- Re: [widgets] P&C, assertion in wrong spec
- Re: [widgets] P&C, assertion in wrong spec
- Re: CfC: to publish a new WD of the DOM3 Events spec; deadline Sep 4
- Re: CfC: to publish a new WD of the DOM3 Events spec; deadline Sep 4
- Re: DnD vs CnP (was Copy/Paste Events)
Sunday, 30 August 2009
- Re: [WebIDL] "proper UTF-16 string"
- Re: [WebIDL] mixins and [[Prototype]]s (and <object>s)
- Re: [WebStorage] Keepin' it in the family?
- Re: [widgets] P&C UA does not deal with SVG icons
- Re: [widgets] P&C, assertion in wrong spec
- Re: [widgets] P&C, assertion in wrong spec
- Re: [WebStorage] Keepin' it in the family?
Friday, 28 August 2009
- Re: CfC: to publish a new WD of the DOM3 Events spec; deadline Sep 4
- Re: CfC: to publish a new WD of the DOM3 Events spec; deadline Sep 4
- Re: CfC: to publish a new WD of the DOM3 Events spec; deadline Sep 4
- Re: CfC: to publish a new WD of the DOM3 Events spec; deadline Sep 4
- CfC: to publish a new WD of the DOM3 Events spec; deadline Sep 4
- Re: [widgets] P&C the following should be a note
- Re: [widgets] P&C UA does not deal with SVG icons
- Re: [widgets] P&C the following should be a note
- Re: [widgets] More misplaced assertions
- Re: [widgets] P&C, assertion in wrong spec
- Re: [webdatabase] changeVersion should allow all callbacks to be optional
- Re: [widgets] P&C UA does not deal with SVG icons
- Re: [widgets] P&C, assertion in wrong spec
- [webdatabase] changeVersion should allow all callbacks to be optional
- Re: [widgets] P&C, assertion in wrong spec
- Re: [widgets] P&C UA does not deal with SVG icons
- Re: [widgets] More misplaced assertions
- Re: ISSUE-99 (listen): Add shorter method names for addEventListener, et al? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-99 (listen): Add shorter method names for addEventListener, et al? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: [widgets] P&C UA does not deal with SVG icons
- Re: [widgets] P&C the following should be a note
- Re: [widgets] P&C, assertion in wrong spec
- Re: [widgets] More misplaced assertions
- Re: ISSUE-99 (listen): Add shorter method names for addEventListener, et al? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-99 (listen): Add shorter method names for addEventListener, et al? [DOM3 Events]
Thursday, 27 August 2009
- [WARP] Last Call comments (1)
- PFWG comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration Last Call (late, very late)
- [widgets] P&C UA does not deal with SVG icons
- [widgets] P&C the following should be a note
- [widgets] More misplaced assertions
- [widgets] Draft Minutes for 27 August 2009 Voice Conference
- [widgets] P&C, assertion in wrong spec
- [WebIDL] "proper UTF-16 string"
- Re: ISSUE-99 (listen): Add shorter method names for addEventListener, et al? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-99 (listen): Add shorter method names for addEventListener, et al? [DOM3 Events]
- RE: DOM3EV: [ViewModes] typeArg on initXXXEvent
- Re: DnD vs CnP (was Copy/Paste Events)
- ISSUE-99 (listen): Add shorter method names for addEventListener, et al? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: DOM3EV: [ViewModes] typeArg on initXXXEvent
- Re: addEventListener naming
Wednesday, 26 August 2009
- Re: addEventListener naming
- Re: DnD vs CnP (was Copy/Paste Events)
- RE: Window Modes todo
- ISSUE-98 (Relation to DOM3Events): Cargo-culting [ViewModes]
- ISSUE-97 (ViewModes vs. CSSOM): How is ViewModes DOM related to CSSOM? [ViewModes]
- ISSUE-96 (Split of the specification): Should we split the ViewModes specification? [ViewModes]
- [widgets] Draft Agenda for 27 August 2009 Voice Conf
- Reminder: Widgets Test Workshop in Düsseldorf, 21-23/09
Tuesday, 25 August 2009
- Accept header setting in XHR
- XHR request state vs provisional responses
- [admin] Spec dependencies and advancing a spec
- Re: Moving alerting methods to DAP (was: Re: [widgets] Draft Minutes from 13 August 2009 Voice Conf)
- Re: [File API] encoding parameter
- RE: Window Modes - best practice and scalability
- [File API] encoding parameter
- RE: DOM3EV: [ViewModes] typeArg on initXXXEvent
- Re: Web IDL syntax
Monday, 24 August 2009
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: Moving alerting methods to DAP (was: Re: [widgets] Draft Minutes from 13 August 2009 Voice Conf)
- Re: DOM3EV: [ViewModes] typeArg on initXXXEvent
- Re: DOM3EV: [ViewModes] typeArg on initXXXEvent
- RE: DOM3EV: [ViewModes] typeArg on initXXXEvent
- Re: DOM3EV: [ViewModes] typeArg on initXXXEvent
- DOM3EV: [ViewModes] typeArg on initXXXEvent
- RE: Orientation event in Firefox
- Logistical information regarding the Duesseldorf Widget Testing Face-to-Face in September
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
- Re: Orientation event in Firefox
- Re: FileReader objects for loading local files on local web pages
- Re: Heads up: Widgets view modes
- Heads up: Widgets view modes
- Re: [Window/View Modes] Naming + Feature vs. Query: suggested changes
- RE: [ViewModes] Proposal: split the specification, add new events
- Re: [ViewModes] Proposal: split the specification, add new events
- Re: FileReader objects for loading local files on local web pages
- Re: [whatwg] Orientation event in Firefox
- Re: [Window/View Modes] Naming + Feature vs. Query: suggested changes
- Re: Window Modes - best practice and scalability
- Moving alerting methods to DAP (was: Re: [widgets] Draft Minutes from 13 August 2009 Voice Conf)
- RE: Orientation event in Firefox
Sunday, 23 August 2009
Saturday, 22 August 2009
- Re: DnD vs CnP (was Copy/Paste Events)
- Re: DnD vs CnP (was Copy/Paste Events)
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
- Re: DnD vs CnP (was Copy/Paste Events)
Friday, 21 August 2009
- Re: [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: APIs and Events spec; deadline 15 Sept 2009
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
Thursday, 20 August 2009
- Re: [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: APIs and Events spec; deadline 15 Sept 2009
- Re: [widgets] More comments on A&E LCWD
- Re: [WebStorage] Keepin' it in the family?
- Re: [WebStorage] Keepin' it in the family?
- Re: [WebStorage] Keepin' it in the family?
- Re: [WebStorage] Keepin' it in the family?
- Re: [widgets] More comments on A&E LCWD
- [widgets] A&E renamed to Widgets 1.0: The widget Interface
- [widgets] Web Storage and storage area definition Re: [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: APIs and Events spec; deadline 15 Sept 2009
- FW: [ViewModes] Proposal: split the specification, add new events
- [widgets] Draft Minutes from 20 August 2009 Voice Conf
- [WebStorage] Keepin' it in the family?
- [widgets] Seeking approval of P&C Test Suite templates and guide
- [WebIDL] mixins and [[Prototype]]s (and <object>s)
- Re: [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: APIs and Events spec; deadline 15 Sept 2009
- Re: [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: APIs and Events spec; deadline 15 Sept 2009
- Re: [widgets] More comments on A&E LCWD
- [ViewModes] Proposal: split the specification, add new events
- Re: [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: APIs and Events spec; deadline 15 Sept 2009
- Re: [widgets] More comments on A&E LCWD
- Re: [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: APIs and Events spec; deadline 15 Sept 2009
- Re: [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: APIs and Events spec; deadline 15 Sept 2009
- Re: [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: APIs and Events spec; deadline 15 Sept 2009
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
Wednesday, 19 August 2009
- Re: File API to separate reading from files
- Re: Alternative File API
- Re: File API to separate reading from files
- Re: File API to separate reading from files
- Re: Alternative File API
- Re: File API to separate reading from files
- Re: File API to separate reading from files
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: Alternative File API
- Re: Alternative File API
- File API to separate reading from files
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: APIs and Events spec; deadline 15 Sept 2009
- Re: [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: APIs and Events spec; deadline 15 Sept 2009
- [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: Access Requests Policy (WARP) spec; deadline 20 Sept 2009
- [widgets] Draft Agenda for 20 August 2009 Voice Conf
- Re: [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: APIs and Events spec; deadline 15 Sept 2009
- Re: Alternative File API
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: Using progress events for other purposes
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- [widgets] Seeking comments on Last Call WD of Widgets: APIs and Events spec; deadline 15 Sept 2009
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: Alternative File API
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
Tuesday, 18 August 2009
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: CfC: publish new WDs of XHR and XHR2; deadline 18 August
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: Alternative File API
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: Alternative File API
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: Alternative File API
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: Alternative File API
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: Alternative File API
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- [ViewModes] Spec moved
- Re: [Window/View Modes] Naming + Feature vs. Query: suggested changes
- RE: [Window/View Modes] Naming + Feature vs. Query: suggested changes
- Re: [Window/View Modes] Naming + Feature vs. Query: suggested changes
- RE: [Window/View Modes] Naming + Feature vs. Query: suggested changes
- Re: [Window/View Modes] Naming + Feature vs. Query: suggested changes
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: Using progress events for other purposes
- [Window/View Modes] Naming + Feature vs. Query: suggested changes
- HTTP status code equivalents for file:// operations - compat with xhr
- Re: Alternative File API
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: Alternative File API
- FileReader objects for loading local files on local web pages
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
Monday, 17 August 2009
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Using progress events for other purposes
- Feedback on the Progress Events spec
- [widgets] P&C Test Suite
- Re: Alternative File API
- Re: Widgets P&C CR Question
- Re: Alternative File API
- Window Modes - best practice and scalability
- Re: Alternative File API
Sunday, 16 August 2009
- Re: Alternative File API
- Re: Alternative File API
- Re: [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
- Re: Access control and cross-origin redirect question
- Re: Access control and cross-origin redirect question
- Re: Things missing from Web IDL for HTML5
Saturday, 15 August 2009
- Access control and cross-origin redirect question
- Re: Alternative File API
- Re: Things missing from Web IDL for HTML5
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks (was: Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback)
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks (was: Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback)
Friday, 14 August 2009
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks (was: Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback)
- RE: [i18n+P&C] IRI/URI normalization
- RE: [i18n+P&C] IRI/URI normalization
- Re: FileAPI Feedback
- Re: please fix status of File Upload editor's draft
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks (was: Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback)
- Widgets P&C CR Question
- [widgets] A&E ready for LC
- RE: [i18n+P&C] IRI/URI normalization
- [i18n+P&C] IRI/URI normalization
- Re: Widget Accessibility
- Re: Widget Accessibility
- Re: Widget Accessibility
- Re: [P&C] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization
- Re: CfC: publish new WDs of XHR and XHR2; deadline 18 August
- Re: Widget Accessibility
- Re: Widget Accessibility
- Re: Widget Accessibility
- Re: Widget Accessibility
- Re: Widget Accessibility
- Re: Widget Accessibility
- Re: DnD vs CnP (was Copy/Paste Events)
Thursday, 13 August 2009
- Re: CfC: publish new WDs of XHR and XHR2; deadline 18 August
- proposal to expose word breaker through JavaScript: range.expand()
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: Widget Accessibility
- Re: Widget Accessibility
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: CfC: publish new WDs of XHR and XHR2; deadline 18 August
- [widgets] Draft Minutes from 13 August 2009 Voice Conf
- Close ACTION-357
- Re: [P&C] utf8-char in Zip-rel-path
- RE: [P&C] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization
- Re: [P&C] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization
- RE: [P&C] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization
- RE: [P&C] utf8-char in Zip-rel-path
- Re: DnD vs CnP (was Copy/Paste Events)
- Re: Copy/Paste Events
- Re: [widgets] Test Suite for Packaging and Configuration
- Re: CfC: publish new WDs of XHR and XHR2; deadline 18 August
- Re: CfC: publish new WDs of XHR and XHR2; deadline 18 August
- CfC: publish new WDs of XHR and XHR2; deadline 18 August
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
- Re: RFC: WebApp timing
- Re: RFC: WebApp timing
- Re: RFC: WebApp timing
- Re: RFC: WebApp timing
- Re: RFC: WebApp timing
- Re: RFC: WebApp timing
- RFC: WebApp timing
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
Wednesday, 12 August 2009
- Re: [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
- Re: please fix status of File Upload editor's draft
- Re: [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
- ToDos on File API | Re: please fix status of File Upload editor's draft
- Re: please fix status of File Upload editor's draft
- Re: please fix status of File Upload editor's draft
- Re: please fix status of File Upload editor's draft
- please fix status of File Upload editor's draft
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: Publishing XMLHttpRequest
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
- Re: Publishing XMLHttpRequest
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
- Re: Publishing XMLHttpRequest
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: FileAPI "splice" method
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Alain Vagner is out of the office.
- Re: FileAPI Feedback
- Re: Alternative File API
- Publishing XMLHttpRequest
- [widgets] Draft Agenda for 13 August 2009 Voice Conf
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest] withCredentials=false and returned cookies
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest] question about default value of withCredentials
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- ISSUE-95: P&C CR: Conformance checker behavior intermixed with UA behavior [Widgets]
- ISSUE-94: P&C CR: Try to fallback to default start files when src path is invalid or not existing [Widgets]
- ISSUE-93: P&C CR: deprecated, grandfathered, and redundant tags should be skipped [Widgets]
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest] withCredentials=false and returned cookies
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest] withCredentials=false and returned cookies
- Alternative File API
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: [webdatabase] SQLError codes
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
Tuesday, 11 August 2009
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- [progress events] editorial fixes and module
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- [widgets] P&C BUG ALERT: Conformance checker behavior intermixed with UA behavior
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: Things missing from Web IDL for HTML5
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks (was: Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback)
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
Monday, 10 August 2009
- Re: [widgets] BUG ALERT for P+C spec: Try to fallback to default start files when src path is invalid or not existing
- Re: [widgets] Test Suite for Packaging and Configuration
- Re: [widgets] Test Suite for Packaging and Configuration
Sunday, 9 August 2009
- [Bug 7104] Disagreement on handling of null value for localStorage.setItem()
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
Saturday, 8 August 2009
- FileAPI Feedback
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks (was: Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback)
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: Things missing from Web IDL for HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] ISSUE-44 (EventsAndWindow): Should DOM3 Events cover the interaction of events and the Window object? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
- Things missing from Web IDL for HTML5
Friday, 7 August 2009
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
- Re: FileAPI "splice" method
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
- Re: [widgets] Test Suite for Packaging and Configuration
- [widgets] Test Suite for Packaging and Configuration
- Re: Widget Accessibility
- Widget Accessibility
- Re: [widgets] BUG ALERT for P+C spec: Try to fallback to default start files when src path is invalid or not existing
- Re: [P&C] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization
- Re: [P&C] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization
- Re: [P&C] utf8-char in Zip-rel-path
- Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: [whatwg] An BinaryArchive API for HTML5?
- Re: [PrototypeRoot]
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
Thursday, 6 August 2009
- [Widgets] WARP LC comments
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
- Re: [File API] events vs callbacks (was: Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback)
- Re: [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
- RE: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- [File API] feedback on August 1/5 draft
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- FileAPI "splice" method
- Re: Web Storage how to check for support?
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: Web Storage how to check for support?
- Re: Web Storage how to check for support?
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
Wednesday, 5 August 2009
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- LCWD comment on Widgets 1.0: Access Requests Policy - reference RFC 2817
Tuesday, 4 August 2009
Wednesday, 5 August 2009
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- [File API] events vs callbacks (was: Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback)
- Re: Multipart or TAR archive/package support for all APIs (Performance and scalability)
- Re: Multipart or TAR archive/package support for all APIs (Performance and scalability)
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: [whatwg] An BinaryArchive API for HTML5?
- New FileAPI Draft | was Re: FileAPI feedback
- Re: [whatwg] An BinaryArchive API for HTML5?
- RE: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
Tuesday, 4 August 2009
- Re: Multipart or TAR archive/package support for all APIs (Performance and scalability)
- Re: Copy/Paste Events
- Multipart or TAR archive/package support for all APIs (Performance and scalability)
- Re: [widgets] Test Suite Creation
- Re: [widgets] Test Suite Creation
- Re: HTML5: further input devices
Monday, 3 August 2009
- Re: [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
- Re: [whatwg] HTML5: has input device: use motion detection been included?
- RE: [whatwg] HTML5: has input device: use motion detection been included?
- Re: HTML5: has input device: use motion detection been included?
- HTML5: has input device: use motion detection been included?
- Re: Copy/Paste Events
- Re: [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
Saturday, 1 August 2009
Monday, 3 August 2009
Saturday, 1 August 2009
Friday, 31 July 2009
- Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?
- Re: [widgets] Test Suite Creation
- [widgets] BUG ALERT for P+C spec: Try to fallback to default start files when src path is invalid or not existing
- [widgets] BUG ALERT for P+C spec: deprecated, grandfathered, and redundant tags should be skipped.
- Re: Is localStorage read and write-able offlne?
- Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?
Thursday, 30 July 2009
- Re: [whatwg] An BinaryArchive API for HTML5?
- [XMLHttpRequest] question about default value of withCredentials
- Re: Is localStorage read and write-able offlne?
- [XMLHttpRequest] withCredentials=false and returned cookies
- Re: Is localStorage read and write-able offlne?
- Re: Is localStorage read and write-able offlne?
- Re: Is localStorage read and write-able offlne?
- Re: Is localStorage read and write-able offlne?
- [widgets] Draft Minutes for 30 July 2009 Voice Conf
- Re: [whatwg] An BinaryArchive API for HTML5?
- Re: proposal to expose word breaker through JavaScript
- Is localStorage read and write-able offlne?
- Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 30 July 2009 Voice Conference
- RE: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- WebIDL checker
Wednesday, 29 July 2009
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [widgets] Package MIME Type
- Re: proposal to expose word breaker through JavaScript
- [widgets] Package MIME Type
- Re: proposal to expose word breaker through JavaScript
- Re: proposal to expose word breaker through JavaScript
- [widgets] Draft Agenda for 30 July 2009 Voice Conference
- proposal to expose word breaker through JavaScript
Tuesday, 28 July 2009
- Re: File API Feedback
- Re: File API Feedback
- RE: Copy/Paste Events
- Re: Copy/Paste Events
- Re: Copy/Paste Events
- Re: Treating persistent storage as cookies: mozilla & safari
- RE: [P&C] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization
- Re: Copy/Paste Events
- RE: [P&C] utf8-char in Zip-rel-path
- RE: [WARP] @required attribute on <access> element
Monday, 27 July 2009
Tuesday, 28 July 2009
- Re: [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
- Re: [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
- Re: [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
Monday, 27 July 2009
- RE: Copy/Paste Events
- Re: Copy/Paste Events
- Re: [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
- Re: [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
- Re: [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
- Re: [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
- Re: [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
- Re: [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
- Re: Treating persistent storage as cookies: mozilla & safari
- Re: Treating persistent storage as cookies: mozilla & safari
- Treating persistent storage as cookies: mozilla & safari
- Re: [widgets] removing onmodechange and viewMode from A&E
- Re: [WARP] @required attribute on <access> element
- Re: [P&C] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization
- Re: [P&C] utf8-char in Zip-rel-path
- Re: Web Storage how to check for support?
- Re: [widgets] Relationship of Widget viewmodes and OpenSocial view types
- Re: Web Storage how to check for support?
- Web Storage how to check for support?
- Re: Window Modes todo
- Re: Window Modes todo
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: Specs using Web IDL
- [widgets] Relationship of Widget viewmodes and OpenSocial view types
- Re: Window Modes todo
- Re: Copy/Paste Events
- Copy/Paste Events
- RE: Window Modes todo
Sunday, 26 July 2009
- RE: [P&C] utf8-char in Zip-rel-path
- RE: [Widget URI] Bugs (1)
- [Widget URI] Bugs (1)
- RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- [Widgets] URI Scheme -> URI [+ Scheme]
- RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- [P&C] utf8-char in Zip-rel-path
- RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Re: File API Feedback
Saturday, 25 July 2009
- RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Re: [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- RE: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- RE: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- [P&C] Low-level internationalization, XML deserialization, IRI or URI, IRI normalization
- Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Progress
- [WebDatabase] Database interface (vs. DatabaseSync interface)
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
Friday, 24 July 2009
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Solution proposed (was: Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model')
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- RE: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?
- Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Progress
- Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Progress
- [selectors-api] Test Suite Progress
- RE: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- RE: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- RE: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
Thursday, 23 July 2009
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: [widgets] Test Suite Creation
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- RE: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- RE: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- New Role in T-Mobile Germany
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
Wednesday, 22 July 2009
Tuesday, 21 July 2009
Thursday, 23 July 2009
Wednesday, 22 July 2009
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: File Upload Status ?
- Re: File API Feedback
- Voice recording in JetPack
- RE: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- [widgets] Test Suite Creation
- Re: File API Feedback
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- RE: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: File API Feedback
- Re: File API Feedback
Tuesday, 21 July 2009
- Re: File API Feedback
- Re: [widgets] removing onmodechange and viewMode from A&E
- Re: [widgets] removing onmodechange and viewMode from A&E
- [widgets] removing onmodechange and viewMode from A&E
- Re: [widgets] localStorage vs preferences
- Re: [widgets] localStorage vs preferences
Monday, 20 July 2009
- Re: [selectors api] test suite red values
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- [WARP] Isn't <access> our first feature?
- Re: [widgets] localStorage vs preferences
- Re: Suggesstions on "Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration" document
- Re: [widgets] localStorage vs preferences
- [WARP] @required attribute on <access> element
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: [widgets] localStorage vs preferences
- Re: [widgets] localStorage vs preferences
- Re: [widgets] localStorage vs preferences
- Re: [widgets] localStorage vs preferences
- [widgets] localStorage vs preferences
- Re: [selectors api] test suite red values
Sunday, 19 July 2009
- Re: Modules for IDL fragments in W3C specifications (was: Re: An import statement for Web IDL)
- Re: Modules for IDL fragments in W3C specifications (was: Re: An import statement for Web IDL)
- Re: [selectors api] test suite red values
Saturday, 18 July 2009
Friday, 17 July 2009
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: [WebStorage] Property enumeration and checking presence
- Re: [widgets] Wookie accepted into Apache Incubator
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- [widgets] Wookie accepted into Apache Incubator
- RE: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: [widgets] conformance requirements review
- RE: [widgets] conformance requirements review
- Suggesstions on "Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration" document
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
- Re: Window Modes todo
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
Thursday, 16 July 2009
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- RE: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
- Re: DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
- Re: WebDatabase/WebStorage (was Re: Points of order on this WG)
- Re: WebDatabase/WebStorage (was Re: Points of order on this WG)
- Re: WebIDL and prototype chains
- DataCache API - editor's draft available
- Re: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- WebIDL and prototype chains
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- WebDatabase/WebStorage (was Re: Points of order on this WG)
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model'
- [WebStorage]
- RE: [widgets] P&C progression to CR
- Re: [widgets] P&C progression to CR
- Re: [widgets] P&C progression to CR
- [widgets] P&C progression to CR
- Re: Specs using Web IDL
- Re: Window Modes todo
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: Specs using Web IDL
- Re: Window Modes todo
Wednesday, 15 July 2009
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: Points of order on this WG
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: Points of order on this WG
- Re: Widgets PAG seeks feedback on Widget Updates spec
- Re: Widgets PAG seeks feedback on Widget Updates spec
- RE: [widgets] conformance requirements review
- Re: Web Storage Spec as PDF
- Web Storage Spec as PDF
- Re: Widgets PAG seeks feedback on Widget Updates spec
- Re: Widgets PAG seeks feedback on Widget Updates spec
- Window Modes todo
- Re: Widgets PAG seeks feedback on Widget Updates spec
- Re: Points of order on this WG
- Re: Widget Test Cases Creation Event -> September 21st-23rd, Düsseldorf
- Re: [Bug 7104] New: Disagreement on handling of null value for localStorage.setItem()
Tuesday, 14 July 2009
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- [Bug 7104] New: Disagreement on handling of null value for localStorage.setItem()
- [DOM3Events] Action-375 Guiding Principles Thoughts
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: WebIDL extension proposal for [Enumerable] interface attribute
- Re: WebIDL extension proposal for [Enumerable] interface attribute
- Re: Input events, checkboxes and radio buttons
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: Input events, checkboxes and radio buttons
- setting unsigned long attributes
Monday, 13 July 2009
- Re: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 6: Use of its:dir
- Re: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 6: Use of its:dir
- Widget Test Cases Creation Event -> September 21st-23rd, Düsseldorf
- RE: [widgets] conformance requirements review
- Re: About initStorageEvent and initStorageEventNS
- About initStorageEvent and initStorageEventNS
- Re: WebIDL extension proposal for [Enumerable] interface attribute
- Re: WebIDL extension proposal for [Enumerable] interface attribute
- Re: WebIDL extension proposal for [Enumerable] interface attribute
Sunday, 12 July 2009
Saturday, 11 July 2009
- Re: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 6: Use of its:dir
- Re: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 6: Use of its:dir
- RE: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 6: Use of its:dir
Friday, 10 July 2009
- RE: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 6: Use of its:dir
- Re: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 2: Clarify IRI/URI
- Re: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 7: Step not necessary?
- Re: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 6: Use of its:dir
- RE: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 6: Use of its:dir
- Re: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 7: Step not necessary?
- Re: Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration LCWD review
- RE: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 7: Step not necessary?
- Re: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 2: Clarify IRI/URI
- Re: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 7: Step not necessary?
- Re: WebIDL extension proposal for [Enumerable] interface attribute
- Re: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 6: Use of its:dir
- Re: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 5: Too small arbitrary limit on locale ids
- Re: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 4: Various positive observations
- Re: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 3: Widget metadata
- Re: [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 1: Wrong language tag.
- Re: WebIDL extension proposal for [Enumerable] interface attribute
- Re: [webworkers] Tasks
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: Web IDL syntax
Thursday, 9 July 2009
- [widgets] Late comments for the 28 May 2009 LCWD of Packaging and Configuration spec
- Re: [WIDGET URI] i18n comment 1: URI Spec
- [WIDGET URI] i18n comment 1: URI Spec
- [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 7: Step not necessary?
- [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 6: Use of its:dir
- [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 5: Too small arbitrary limit on locale ids
- [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 4: Various positive observations
- [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 3: Widget metadata
- [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 2: Clarify IRI/URI
- [WIDGET PC] i18n comment 1: Wrong language tag.
- Re: [widgets] P&C, outstanding feedbac...
- [widgets] Draft Minutes from 9 July 2009 Voice Conf
- Re: A+E todo
- Re: Comments on Widgets spec
Wednesday, 8 July 2009
Thursday, 9 July 2009
Wednesday, 8 July 2009
- Re: File API Feedback
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and configuration, 9.1 Processing rules
- Re: [widgets] P&C, outstanding feedbac...
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and configuration, 9.1 Processing rules
- Re: [widgets] P&C, outstanding feedbac...
- Re: widgets feedback
- Re: widgets feedback
- Re: Comments on Widgets spec
- [widgets] Draft Agenda for 9 July 2009 Voice Conference
- Request for Comments: LCWD of Geolocation API; deadline 31 July 2009
- Re: Comments on Widgets spec
- Re: [WebIDL] Sequences and arrays
Tuesday, 7 July 2009
- Re: Berkeley DB license (was Re: Points of order on this WG)
- Re: [webstorage] Ambiguous Requirement for Key Ordering
- Re: [widgets] conformance requirements review
- Re: [widgets] conformance requirements review
- Re: Comments on Widgets spec
- Re: widgets feedback
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and configuration, 9.1 Processing rules
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and configuration, 9.1 Processing rules
- RE: [widgets] conformance requirements review
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and configuration, 9.1 Processing rules
- re: [widgets] Rule for Parsing a Non-negative Integer
- Re: [WebIDL] Sequences and arrays
- [WebIDL] Sequences and arrays
- Re: [cors] Incorrect use cases
Monday, 6 July 2009
- [cors] Incorrect use cases
- Re: An import statement for Web IDL
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and configuration, 9.1 Processing rules
- Re: File API Feedback
- Re: File API Feedback
- Re: File API Feedback
- Re: widgets feedback
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and configuration, 9.1 Processing rules
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and configuration, 9.1 Processing rules
- Re: [widgets] Last Call Comments
- Re: [widgets] Rule for dealing with an invalid Zip archive
- Re: [widgets] Rule for dealing with an invalid Zip archive
- Re: Widgets PAG seeks feedback on Widget Updates spec
- Re: Widgets PAG seeks feedback on Widget Updates spec
- Re: [widgets] P&C LC comments on I18N/L10N
- Re: File API Feedback
- Re: Widgets PAG seeks feedback on Widget Updates spec
- Re: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#reserved-file-and-folder-names
- Re: Widgets PAG seeks feedback on Widget Updates spec
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and configuration, 9.1 Processing rules
Sunday, 5 July 2009
Saturday, 4 July 2009
- Re: [widgets] P&C, outstanding feedbac...
- Re: widgets feedback
- Re: widgets feedback
- Re: widgets feedback
- Re: widgets feedback
- Re: Points of order on this WG
- Re: Points of order on this WG
- Re: Points of order on this WG
- Re: Points of order on this WG
Friday, 3 July 2009
- Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API
- Re: [widgets] P&C, outstanding feedbac...
- Re: widgets feedback
- Re: widgets feedback
- Re: widgets feedback
- Re: widgets feedback
- Re: [widgets] Elements are grouped by language:
- Re: An import statement for Web IDL
- Re: [widgets] Step 7 - Process the Configuration Document
- Re: [widgets] P&C, outstanding feedbac...
- Re: Chat with Marcos Caceres
- Re: WebIDL extension proposal for [Enumerable] interface attribute
- Re: [widgets] One element is allowed per language:
- Re: [widgets] P&C LC comments on I18N/L10N
- Modules for IDL fragments in W3C specifications (was: Re: An import statement for Web IDL)
- Re: WebIDL extension proposal for [Enumerable] interface attribute
Thursday, 2 July 2009
- Re: [File API] data URL method
- Re: [File API] data URL method
- Re: [File API] data URL method
- Re: XMLSerializer should run HTML serialization algorithm when input doc is HTML
- Re: [File API] data URL method
- [widgets] Draft Minutes from 2 July 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and configuration, 9.1 Processing rules
- Re: [widgets] P&C, outstanding feedbac...
- [widgets] P&C, outstanding feedbac...
- Re: [widgets] P&C LC comments on I18N/L10N
- Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 2 July 2009 Voice Conference
- Away 3-13 July
- [File API] data URL method
- Re: XMLSerializer should run HTML serialization algorithm when input doc is HTML
- Re: XMLSerializer should run HTML serialization algorithm when input doc is HTML
- Re: An import statement for Web IDL
- Re: WebIDL extension proposal for [Enumerable] interface attribute
- Re: An import statement for Web IDL
- Re: An import statement for Web IDL
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: File API Feedback
- Re: WebIDL extension proposal for [Enumerable] interface attribute
- Re: Simple Web Storage
- Re: XMLSerializer should run HTML serialization algorithm when input doc is HTML
- Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject
Wednesday, 1 July 2009
- Re: Simple Web Storage
- Re: [webidl] XMLHttpRequest interface object
- Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 2 July 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: Denoting privacy-sensitive requests (was: Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?)
- Re: Denoting privacy-sensitive requests (was: Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?)
- [widgets] Reminder: work on the Updates spec may continue
- Re: Simple Web Storage
- Re: Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration questions
- WebIDL extension proposal for [Enumerable] interface attribute
- Denoting privacy-sensitive requests (was: Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?)
- Re: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#default-start-file0
- Re: An icon must be located either at the root of the widget package or at the root of a locale folder.
- [widgets] Draft Agenda for 2 July 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [cors] Additional Comments on 17 March 2009 cors draft
- RE: [widgets] P&C comments, 9
- Re: [widgets] P&C comments, 9
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and configuration, 9.1 Processing rules
- XMLSerializer should run HTML serialization algorithm when input doc is HTML
- RE: [widgets] P&C comments, 8
- [widgets] P&C comments, 9
- Simple Web Storage
- Re: [widgets] P&C comments, 8
- Re: [widgets] Rule for Determining if a potential Zip archive is a Zip archive
- Re: [widgets] Rule for Identifying the Media Type of an Image
- Re: [widgets] Rule for Getting Text Content
- Re: File API Feedback
- Re: [widgets] Rule for Getting Text Content with Normalized White Space
- Re: [cors] Additional Comments on 17 March 2009 cors draft
- Re: [widgets] Rule for getting a single attribute value
- Re: [widgets] Rule for dealing with an invalid Zip archive
- Re: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#reserved-file-and-folder-names
- RE: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject
- RE: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject
- Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject
- RE: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject
- Re: [WebStorage] Property enumeration and checking presence
- RE: [WebIDL] grammar in ABNF
- RE: [WebIDL] grammar in ABNF
- Re: [WebIDL] grammar in ABNF
- Re: [WebIDL] grammar in ABNF
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- RE: [WebIDL] grammar in ABNF
- Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: [WebIDL] Bugs in DOMString conversion to Unichode characters (was Re: "send data using the Web Socket" and UCS-2)
- Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject
- Re: [WebIDL] Bugs in DOMString conversion to Unichode characters (was Re: "send data using the Web Socket" and UCS-2)
- Re: File API Feedback
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: [WebIDL] grammar in ABNF
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: Web IDL syntax
- Re: File API Feedback