- From: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:40:36 +0100
- To: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- CC: "marcosc@opera.com Caceres" <marcosc@opera.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi Frederick, >>re author, would the term "creator" in the sentence from Thomas help, >>this probably doesn't help, since by definition author means creator... Yes, it seems the same. Thomas' statement: " What the author certificate lets you verify is whether a single party is taking responsibility for two widgets. There is indeed no *proof* of authorship here, but a statement that the signer is willing to assume the blame for being the widget's author. Which is all we need, no?" As for me author is just some distinguished entity. That's all and nothing more. I think we should not try to specify in the W3C spec that the author takes the responsibility for what the widget does. It could be legally binding. Is this what we really want? Thanks. Kind regards, Marcin Marcin Hanclik ACCESS Systems Europe GmbH Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465 Mobile: +49-163-8290-646 E-Mail: marcin.hanclik@access-company.com ________________________________________ Access Systems Germany GmbH Essener Strasse 5 | D-46047 Oberhausen HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda www.access-company.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited. If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.
Received on Friday, 27 March 2009 14:41:46 UTC