- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:20:11 -0400
- To: "marcosc@opera.com" <marcosc@opera.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, otsi-arch-sec@omtplists.org
Marcos Thanks for taking this pass. I note a number of editorial corrections that I believe should be made before publishing: 1. Introduction should not have normative statements, and these replicate material later in the document, so change "MAY" to "can" in 2 places. 2. Section 4, #4, change "must" to "MUST" 3. Section 4, #6, change "Security" to "security" 4. Section 5.3.1, include blank line between bullet with DIGIT and next bullet 5. Section 6, replace ".." with "." in editorial note 6. Section 6.1, change "DSAwithSHA" to "DSAwithSHA1" 7. Section 7.2, change link to be from "signature file", it is currently broken 8. End of section 8, remove example from sentence, change "For example, end-users" to "End-users" and combine with previous paragraph. 9. Add note to [XMLDSIG-Properties] reference as follows (at end of reference entry): Note, section 9 includes additions made in the XML Security WG to the XML Signature Properties editors draft (subsequent to First Public Working Draft) that are used in this specification. --- I also suggest you make sure that all changes in the working draft are also reflected in what is checked into the Editors draft in CVS so we can make changes as needed without losing these latest changes for the working draft (the only difference need be the setting as editors vs working draft I think). I also notice on a substantive level that you changed the namespace. Was the reason to match a pre-existing choice for the Packaging and Configuration? Is this an item for discussion? The other changes looked good, thanks for improving the draft. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Mar 25, 2009, at 11:41 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: > Hi All, > A new Working Draft of the Widgets 1.0: Dig Sig is ready to be > published [1]. I've put the date of publication as the 31 of March, > with the hope the W3C will publish it some time next week. If > possible, the editors would be greatly appreciate if someone could > check over it before it gets published. Please send any feedback you > might have by the end of the week. > > Kind regards, > Marcos > [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/ > -- > Marcos Caceres > http://datadriven.com.au >
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 22:21:21 UTC