- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:37:33 +0100
- To: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: > revised to be as follows, now that I look at it more closely: > > Note: > > The Web Applications WG is seeking feedback on required algorithms for > widget signatures, in particular which algorithms should be required in > addition to RSAwithSHA256. The WG has not yet agreed on final set of > required algorithms. "on final set" -> "on a final set" > This Widget Signature specification relies on XML SIgnature 1.1 which > introduces new and stronger algorithms to XML Signature. The XML Security WG > has not yet achieved consensus on required algorithms in XML SIgnature 1.1, > in particular whether to mandate > ECDSAwithSHA256. The XML Security WG is also requesting feedback on the > FPWD of XML SIgnature 1.1. > Looks good to me. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2009 15:38:12 UTC