- From: Arve Bersvendsen <arveb@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:29:44 +0100
- To: "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: "public-webapps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:22:54 +0100, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > I see a limited use case for the sort of example you propose, but I'm > nevertheless going to push back against it. One reason is that it can > already be described with features, to witness: > > <feature name="url_describing_filesystem_api/music/read"/> Getting in to the edge cases here: What if I have an application where falling back to read access is acceptable, if write fails (In other words, failure to adhere to some option is not fatal)? -- Arve Bersvendsen Developer, Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com/
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 22:30:27 UTC