W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:56:28 +0100
Message-ID: <49C16E0C.7080809@opera.com>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>

On 3/18/09 10:51 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2009, at 16:35 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>> On 3/18/09 4:19 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
>>> Do you have some examples that involve things that aren't pants?
>> <feature name="http://example.org/geo">
>> <option name="start-lat" value="51 6' N"/>
>> <option name="start-long" value="114 1' W"/>
>> </feature>
> You and Arve seem to have different understandings of what this is for,
> his example indicates that he's interested in specifying sub-features of
> a feature, yours seems to point at default values or some form of
> configuration for a feature.
> But more in the following email about why I think this is a bad idea.

Yes, I realized after I sent the emails that both my pants and geo 
location examples should really have been using the <preference> 
element. Arve's example is more what I was trying to get at. The 
proposal stands, the examples don't :)
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 21:57:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:12:51 UTC