- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:56:28 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 3/18/09 10:51 PM, Robin Berjon wrote: > On Mar 18, 2009, at 16:35 , Marcos Caceres wrote: >> On 3/18/09 4:19 PM, Robin Berjon wrote: >>> Do you have some examples that involve things that aren't pants? >> >> <feature name="http://example.org/geo"> >> <option name="start-lat" value="51° 6' N"/> >> <option name="start-long" value="114° 1' W"/> >> </feature> > > You and Arve seem to have different understandings of what this is for, > his example indicates that he's interested in specifying sub-features of > a feature, yours seems to point at default values or some form of > configuration for a feature. > > But more in the following email about why I think this is a bad idea. Yes, I realized after I sent the emails that both my pants and geo location examples should really have been using the <preference> element. Arve's example is more what I was trying to get at. The proposal stands, the examples don't :) Marcos
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 21:57:08 UTC