- From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:34:28 -0400
- To: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, Mark Priestley <Mark.Priestley@vodafone.com>, Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Message-Id: <E91D325C-6DFC-47F9-BFA6-A88FEC8235AD@nokia.com>
Mark One issue you raised was that we have MUSTS on algorithms in the processing rules in section 7.1, but allow other algorithms in the algorithm section with MAY. After our previous email exchange, I suggest the following changes to section 7.1 in Widget Signature [1] to address this concern: (1) Change item 3b from The Algorithm attribute of the ds:digestMethod MUST be set to a digest algorithm specified in the Algorithms section of this document. to The Algorithm attribute of the ds:digestMethod MUST comply with the digest algorithm requirements specified in the Algorithms section of this document. (2) Change 5a from The Algorithm attribute of the ds:CanonicalizationMethod element MUST be set to a Canonicalization method specified in the Algorithms section of this document. to The Algorithm attribute of the ds:CanonicalizationMethod element MUST comply with the Canonicalization method algorithm requirements specified in the Algorithms section of this document. (3) Change 5b from The ds:SignatureValue element MUST contain a signature generated using a Signature method specified in the Algorithms section of this document and MUST use a key that is of the length of arecommended key length. to The Signature method algorithm used in the ds:SignatureValue element MUST comply with Signature method algorithm requirements in the Algorithms section of this document. The Signature MUST be produced using a key of the recommended key length Does this change make sense? Do you have any suggestion or comment? Thanks for the careful review of the draft. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/ > [mp] While this is better I think it misses the fact that we are > strongly recommending the use of certain algorithms. I still like the > idea of including authoring (signing) guidelines/recommendations, ie > you > can sign your widget using any signature algorithm but if you want > it to > work across all W3C widget user agents use algorithm X. Same sort of > thing for digest algorithm and key length. What do you think?
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 20:36:03 UTC