- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:28:13 +0100
- To: "Priestley, Mark, VF-Group" <Mark.Priestley@vodafone.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Priestley, Mark, VF-Group <Mark.Priestley@vodafone.com> wrote: > --------------------------- > Editorial comments > --------------------------- > > General Terminology > > "Widget agent", "widget platform", "application"? -> "widget user > agent"? Lets just use "user agent". I don't think we should have a notion of a "widget user agent". A user agent is one that attempts to implement the said specification; that is, one that only implements signatures. It should be possible to build a user agent that only processes signatures and is unaware any other of the widget 1.0 specifications. > [Comment] by "application" do you mean "widget user agent"? as above. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 10:28:55 UTC