Re: Widget Signature update

Hi Frederick,

On 3/6/09 3:59 PM, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
> I've updated the widget signature document distributor file naming
> convention to the following after discussing this with Josh (thanks Josh):
>
> Naming convention for a distributor signature:
>     |"signature" [1-9][0-9]* ".xml"|
>
>         *
>
>           Each distributor signature /MUST/ have a name consisting of
>           the string "signature" followed by a digit in the range 1-9
>           inclusive, followed by zero or more digits in the range 0-9
>           inclusive and then ".xml", as stated by the BNF. An example is
>           "signature20.xml".
>
>         *
>
>           Leading zeros are disallowed in the numbers.
>
>         *
>
>           Any file name that does not match this BNF /MUST/ be ignored.
>           Thus a file named "signature01.xml" will be ignored. A warning
>           /MAY/ be generated.
>
>         *
>
>           There is no requirement that all the signature file names form
>           a contiguous set of numeric values.
>
>         *
>
>           These signatures /MUST/ be sorted numerically based on the
>           numeric portion of the name. Thus signature2.xml preceeds
>           signature11.xml, for example.
>
>
> See draft
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/#distributor-signatures
>
> I also updated the notation section, changed the code format to be
> italic (without color), and updated the body style to not be quite so large.
>
> Please indicate any comment or corrections on the list.
>

The changes look good to me! thank you.

Kind regards,
Marcos

Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 15:08:23 UTC