Re: [widgets] Agenda for 5 March 2009 Voice Conference

I was going to suggest that Bryan work on Widgets 1.0: Updates. It is
currently the only spec not being actively worked on.

However, Bryan, if you feel strongly about contributing to any other
of the specs, then please do not hesitate to nominate a spec and
section to work on. We could certainly use a hand with the new media
query specs [1].

If you don't already have it, MikeSmith can set you up with CVS access.

Kind regards,
Marcos

[1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-wm/Overview.src.html

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Sullivan, Bryan <BS3131@att.com> wrote:
> My regrets for this call. One input however, in the last F2F there was a call for more editors to help speed up the widgets work (part of the AI to Dave Rogers). Please let me know which specs need editors, and I will make a proposal on where I can help.
>
> Best regards,
> Bryan Sullivan | AT&T
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-webapps-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Barstow
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:28 AM
> To: public-webapps
> Subject: [widgets] Agenda for 5 March 2009 Voice Conference
>
> Below is the draft agenda for the March 5 Widgets Voice Conference (VC).
>
> Inputs and discussion before the meeting on all of the agenda topics
> via public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened
> meeting).
>
> Logistics:
>
>   Time: 23:00 Tokyo; 16:00 Helsinki; 15:00 Paris; 14:00 London;
> 09:00 Boston; 06:00 Seattle
>   Duration = 60 minutes
>   Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 9231 ("WAF1")
>   IRC channel = #wam; irc.w3.org:6665
>   Confidentiality of minutes = Public
>
> Agenda:
>
> 1. Review and tweak agenda
>
> 2. Announcements
>
> 3. DigSig + P&C synchronization - is this now addressed adequately in
> the latest EDs:
>
>  <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/>
>  <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/>
>
> 4. Issue-19 - Widgets digital Signatures spec does not meet required
> use cases and requirements; Proposal to Close this issue:
>
>  <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/19>
>
> 5. Issue-80 - Runtime localization model for widgets; can this be
> closed?
>
>  <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/80>
>
> 6. Issue-82 - potential conflict between the XHTML <access> and
> Widget <access> element. What, if anything, should be done:
>
>  <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/82>
>
> 7. Issue-83 - Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital
> signature. What is the status:
>
>  <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/83>
>
> 8. Widget requirement #37 (URI scheme etc) - see e-mail from Thomas:
>
>  <http://www.w3.org/mid/9DD110C1-D860-40C9-B688-2E08F4D86D20@w3.org>
>
> 9. Open Actions - please address your Open Actions:
>
>  <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products/8>
>
> 10. AOB:
>
> a. June f2f meeting - besides Oslo/Opera and Edinburgh/OMTP, are
> there any other proposals?
>
> b. TPAC meeting in November
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 13:35:12 UTC