- From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 12:06:28 -0500
- To: Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: "Kapyaho Jere (Nokia-D-MSW/Tampere)" <Jere.Kapyaho@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
how about simple italics for code? I'll also look into reducing body text regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote: > yes that has been the case ever since I've started working on this. > > Perhaps there is a W3C standard stylesheet we should be using. I'm not > sure why the spec defines its own styles > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > > > On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:45 AM, Kapyaho Jere (Nokia-D-MSW/Tampere) wrote: > >> Easier on the eye, but to me it’s pretty close to the color of RFC >> 2119 keyword style (em.ct). >> >> Seems like the body text font has grown in size somewhat, compared >> to other specs. >> >> --Jere >> >> On 5.3.2009 18.03, "Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com >>> wrote: >> >> I updated the style for <code> items in the Digital Signature >> specification to brown. >> >> Does this work better? It does not conflict with other color uses as >> far as I can tell. >> >> Please look at >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/ (refresh) >> >> >> regards, Frederick >> >> Frederick Hirsch >> Nokia >> >> >> >> On Mar 5, 2009, at 10:11 AM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote: >>> >>> JS: re styling, orange doesn't work well for me regarding >>> readability >>> >>> MC: I can help with that >>> >>> FH: I'll take a pass at that >>> >
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 17:09:29 UTC