Re: [selectors-api] LCWD comments

Krzysztof Maczyński wrote:
> This makes me even more sorry to have misled you (as you probably 
> already know, since the issue is mentioned in e.g. 
> by 
> asking to write "document" where the text should read "DOM". (D does 
> stand for Document, but in fact there needn't be one. I tend to 
> repeatedly forget that it's an API spec, not a CSS module. And it's 
> perfectly useful for trees rooted at detached Element or 
> DocumentFragment nodes.) Could you, please, revert this one change?

I think you're referring to the change made here at your request:

I have now reverted it.  This shouldn't be a problem since it's only a 
small editorial change.

Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software

Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2009 12:12:26 UTC