- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:23:24 +0100
- To: "public-webapps@w3.org WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Cc: public-pkg-uri-scheme@w3.org
- Message-Id: <38057C2C-EFB7-4744-8C60-F214A9E20193@w3.org>
Getting back to the URI scheme discussion, here's a strawman proposal that's inspired by the Widget case, where scripting and navigation add a few more complexities. I'll be interested in seeing Marcos, Arve and Josh shoot this one down. :) Specifically, we need to say: - how to dereference a URI reference that occurs within a widget resource, and for which the identified resource is included within the widget package - what the base URI property is for any DOM created from a resource within a widget package - what the origin is for any DOM created by the Widget. (e.g., for cross-frame scripting) The critically important point here is that we separate the Origin consideration from the identification and retrieval of resources in the package. Design assumptions: - we can synthesize origins to be globally unique identifiers (as HTML5 does) - we have unique identifiers resources within the package. Typically, these will look filesystem path like, but for the purposes of this proposal, they're opaque identifiers, and totally depend on the package format. Proposal: 1. The manifest is turned into a generic indirection tool that can aim inside the widget. For each resource (identified by absolute URI), the following properties are defined: - Content-Type - Parameters for said Content-Type - identifier for the packaged file that includes a representation of this resource E.g.: <Resource Identifier="http://www.w3.org/"> <ContentInfo Type="text/html"> <Parameter Name="charset">iso-8859-1</Parameter> <Parameter Name="foo">bar</Parameter> </ContentInfo> <Representation>/www.w3.org/Overview.html</Representation> </Resource> Or: <Resource Identifier="http://www.w3.org/"> <ContentInfo Type="text/html"> <Parameter Name="charset">utf-8</Parameter> <Parameter Name="foo">bar</Parameter> </ContentInfo> <Representation>L3d3dy53My5vcmcvT3ZlcnZpZXcuaHRtbAo</ Representation> </Resource> Or: <Resource Identifier="http://www.w3.org/"> <ContentInfo Type="text/html"> <Parameter Name="charset">windows-1251</Parameter> </ContentInfo> <Representation>\SITES\CONSORTIUM\ROOT</Representation> </Resource> ;-) (As an aside, note that it might be important to have an extension point for content type specific parameters here.) 2. When a widget is instantiated, a new globally unique identifier is coined for that instance, at run time. Whenever a resource is retrieved through the manifest indirection, this globally unique identifier is used to construct the relevant origin, not the URI that was used to identify the resource. (This effectively turns each widget instance into a trust domain of its own within HTML's security model, but only includes those resources in that domain that are packaged up.) 3. When a widget navigates to a resource, then the base URI is the URI that was used to *identify* this resource. In the example above, that would mean that no matter what the packaging format does, the base URI will be "http://www.w3.org/", and relative URI references will be resolved relative to it. Note that this proposal would require: 1. Making the manifest mandatory. 2. Mild changes to the packaging spec (in particular, the start file needs to be identified by absolute URI, e.g., htp://..., and through the manifest mechanism, to give an initial base URI) It will be an important security consideration to note that the manifest-driven resource retrieval MUST NOT leak outside the context of the widget engine. Thoughts? Feedback? -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2009 12:23:37 UTC