- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:30:30 +0100
- To: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:26:16 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Charles McCathieNevile: >> If anyone objects to this approach (which saves some administrative >> work and some time), please speak up... > > Web IDL is still a WD. At some point before Rec, I guess selectors-api > would need to block on Web IDL progressing. What point should that be? PR? There does not actually seem to be a requirement in the W3C Process document that e.g. a Recommendation cannot normatively reference a Working Draft by the way... (Not that it would be a very good situation to be in.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2009 11:31:39 UTC